I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 8-15 September 2025

The Rest is History Episode 576 The Irish War of Independence Part I. The Rise of the IRA Between 1909-11 Britain wanted to give Home Rule, but the Northern Irish unionists didn’t want it. World War I froze any progress on the question. Then, during the war, in 1916 the Easter Uprising took advantage of the opportunity of Britain being otherwise distracted, but it was quickly crushed, leading to the arrests of between 1000-1500 people. 187 were imprisoned, and 14 were executed, including Roger Casement. The Nationalists used the deaths for propaganda purposes in the midst of UK apathy. The Unionists, who constituted about 30% had influence in the British cabinet butBritain was taking an each-way bet as Sinn Fein became more prominent. Arthur Griffith, the founder of Sinn Fein, worked as a printer, and organized boycotts and agitation and stood for by-election. Michael Collins was a military organizer within Sinn Fein, not just a gun runner. He emerged when the other leaders were jailed in 1917. De Vallera was the President, and Griffith was the Vice-President of Sinn Fein and they accepted the aim of an independent Irish Republic. In December 1918 there were elections held in the UK and Ireland with an enlarged electorate, with 70% of electors voting for the first time. It yielded a Sinn Fein victory.

The Human Subject The Man With the Artificial Windpipe was Andemariam Beyene, an engineering student from Eritrea studying in Iceland. In 2011 he was desperate for a cure for the large tumour that had been discovered in his trachea. He had tried surgery and radiotherapy and nothing had worked.Dr Paolo Macchiarini, Karolinska Institute’s star surgeon presented himself as Andemarian’s best and last option. He proposed an experimental treatment – but one that had never been done before on a human being. Andemariam would be the first. Unfortunately, he agreed to it. Macchiarini was a good publicist, and published the results of the surgery soon afterwards- too soon, because Andemarian died, as did all three patients who had this surgery. Macchiarini ended up being jailed for 2 1/2 years, and his papers were retracted.

‘No Dancing in the Lift: A Memoir’ by Mandy Sayer

2025, 227 p.

I feel a bit as if I’ve come half-way into a conversation with this book, because this memoir by Mandy Sayer is in fact her fourth (no fear of an unexamined life, here). But although it is discussing her life, it is more a love letter to her father, Gerry, addressed to him in the second person.

At my age, one attends an increasing number of funerals. I’ve often been struck by the practice in giving eulogies where the deceased person is addressed as “you”, as if they are present and listening. This is how Sayer speaks to her father, as she revisits their shared life and describes the last months of his life as she visits him daily as he moves between hospice care and her own apartment.

Her father had not been a constant presence in her life. Her parents, Gerry and Betty, separated when she was ten years old. It was an erratic, bohemian, drug-and-alcohol fuelled upbringing, and when she went to live with her mother, along with her siblings Lisa and Gene, her mother subsided further into alcoholism and toxic relationships. There were reconciliations, and further falling aparts. Her father came back into her life when, at the age of 20 she travelled with him to the United States to busk on the streets and parks of New York City, New Orleans and Colorado, he on drum, she tap-dancing. Now, in No Dancing in the Lift her own marriage has ended and she is a published author circulating in the literary scene in Sydney, and her father is dying of cancer.

Her father had been a noted jazz drummer in Sydney, playing with both local and international acts. He had a cleft lip and palate, which affected his speech badly. As I have a cleft myself, I was interested to see the child’s-eye view of the parent’s condition. It was accepted completely, and she knew that he had spent years at Westmead Children’s Hospital having surgery. (Actually, having experienced it myself, I know that surgery was more a recurrent than ongoing event, often with years in between surgeries- although it might not have been remembered that way). At one stage, her father falls asleep open-mouthed, and for the first time, she could see into his mouth and was appalled to see how incompletely the palate had been repaired.

As her father’s cancer progresses, he becomes hostile and belligerent, although this subsides after further health conditions emerge. Her siblings, having survived the same childhood that she did, are troubled people as well: either distant in the case of her sister, or manipulative in the case of her brother. Both parents had embarked on complicated relationships after the marriage breakup, and as Gerry becomes sicker, people and situations emerge from his past. But fellow musicians and writers emerge as well, and the reefers and drinks flow in what must have seemed a racketty lifestyle in the midst of the inflexibility and judgement of hospitals and institutions.

In the midst of this, Sayer meets fellow author Louis Nowra, who was married at the time and their relationship deepens from initial attraction, to a chaste and tentative friendship, then to a full-blown love affair, observed and encouraged by her father Gerry. Death and love, both becoming stronger at the same time: it is a confronting, and yet in many ways, perfectly natural conjunction.

She has not changed names in this book, and so you meet authors Louis Nowra and Linda Jaivan, musician Jeff Duff, and actors Geoffrey Rush and Cate Blanchett move in and out of the pages. It is an intensely local book, with the landscapes of Sydney and Darlinghurst described evocatively.

From the start of the book, you know as a reader how the book is going to end. What did surprise me was that these events took place twenty five years ago, as the rawness and the hollowness seemed so recent. Although I shouldn’t really be surprised because, as the child, you are always the child. Although, as she says, her father has taught her how to grow old- and in his case, unrepentantly and without necessarily growing up.

My rating: 8.5/10

Sourced from: review copy from Transit Lounge, via Scott Eathorne.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 1-7 September 2025

History Hit The Surrender of Japan In the broadcast to mark the surrender of Japan on August 15th, 1945 Emperor Hirohito’s voice crackled over Japanese airwaves to announce the unthinkable – the surrender of Japan. It was the first voice recording of him, and there would be many Japanese who had never heard him before. This episode, featuring Dr. Evan Mawdsley, points out the Allies wanted regime change because they distrusted the deepseated militarism of Japanese society. Technically, there was a neutrality pact between Japan and USSR signed in 1941, but on 9 August 1945 Russia entered into the Japanese arena, which meant that Japan could no longer defend Manchuria. Days later, the nuclear bombs were dropped. In a bit of what-if history, the podcast goes on to explore what would have happened had Japan not surrendered.

In the Shadows of Utopia Season 2 Episode 12 The Cambodian Civil War Begins Part 2: A Revolution Waged with Empty Hands Time Period Covered 1967-1968. In November 1967 Jackie Kennedy visited Sihanouk (in fact, I saw photos of her at the Raffles Hotel in Phnom Penh when I dropped by there one day). Sihankouk was convinced that there was a communist insurgency in his own country, surrounded by Communist countries, so he began looking increasingly to the United States.

Meanwhile, in November 1967 Pol Pot went to the north eastern base of the CPK (Communist Party of Kampuchea), which was supported by local tribespeople, but poorly armed. Both Vietnam and the CPK planned to have uprisings at New Year in 1968, but there was little support from the Communist parties in other countries: China discouraged the uprising because it was preoccupied with its own cultural revolution, and Vietnam ignored the Khmer pleas for help when skirmishes were being quashed. On January 17th and 18th the CPK attacked army and police depots in order to seize their arms, and the uprising began. It started in Battambang (over near the Thai border), where 10,000 villagers joined in, and moved into the jungles. With no support from China or Vietnam, the CPK went it alone, identifying itself as the vanguard of the revolution, and Pol Pot set himself up as leader. He lavished high praise on China, especially the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward (despite the reality) and the Chinese Student Association emulated the Big Character posters of the Cultural Revolution. All this pro-China action was too much for Sihanouk, who withdrew his ambassador from China. In January 1968 Sihanouk cracked down on the Battambang uprising, blaming everyone. He brought back Lon Nol, who undertook a scorched-earth approach against the uprising. Yet Sihanouk continued to support the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese communists who were in Cambodia, just not the home-grown ones. The United States was aware of the border camps and the Pentagon was even considering invading Cambodia, which was officially neutral, but the State Department put the kibosh on the plan. Sihanouk said that he couldn’t prevent crossings from Vietnam over the border, so he couldn’t object to the US engaging with them. He said he would shut his eyes to any American bombing. Did he know? Did the bombing start under LBJ? Meanwhile, the Tet offensive was under way in Vietnam.

‘Jose “Pepe” Mujica: The Labyrinths of Life’ Dialogue with Kintto Lucas

2020, 119 p.

This is a dialogue between the ex-president of Uruguay, Jose Mujica, and Kintto Lucas, a journalist, writer and Vice-Chancellor and Ambassador for Uruguay under Mujica’s government. As Lucas explains in the introduction, he first met Mujica in the Punta Carretas prison in 1971, when Lucas was just eight years old. He visited his older brother, who like Mujica was a member of the National Liberation Movement – Tupamaros (MLN-T) every Saturday. This was the prison from which 106 Tupamaros escaped in 1971 by tunnelling out of the prison, but Lucas’ brother was not among them. His cell had been changed at the last minute, and he no longer had access to the tunnel. However, by 1972 he was released and exiled to Chile. Kintto left Uruguay in 1980 and lived in Brazil until he returned after the withdrawal of the military in 1985. On his return he joined the MLN as a militant and worked as a journalist on a Mate Amargo bi-weekly Tupumaro newspaper, which became the best-selling newspaper in Uruguay.

Why am I talking so much about the author, and not Mujica himself? That’s because Lucas himself is front and centre in this book, with a 54 page introduction and he certainly doesn’t take a backward step in the interview, either. I didn’t bother counting the words, but I suspect that Lucas talks as much as Mujica does, and at times I just wanted him to shut up.

There’s lots of internal Uruguayan politics in here, which went right over my head. Still, it was good to get beyond the aphorisms and homespun wisdom that Mujica repeated over and over in his many interviews with Western journalists. I’m not sure whether this book was written in English or Spanish- an editor is credited, but not a translator- but it is rather strangled English and not particularly pleasant to read. As Mujica rarely spoke English, I think that this is a transcript of a Spanish conversation translated by the author, but it does not read particularly well.

Apparently when the Tupamaros held up a bank or a cinema, they would harangue the literally captive audience about politics and justice, before letting most of them leave. Reading this, you go away feeling rather ear-bashed by both of them too.

My rating: 6/10

Sourced from: Kindle e-book.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 24th-31 August 2025

Rear Vision (ABC) 2014 and Ukraine’s relationship with Russia. This is a replay of an episode from 2014, just as Russia had invaded Crimea. It all seems rather prophetic now. Ukraine was the largest republic of the former USSR, and it withdrew from USSR in 1991. With hindsight, they were dudded by the Bucharest Memorandum of 1994 whereby they gave up their nuclear arms for a security ‘assurance’ – not a guarantee- of territorial integrity from their guarantors including Russia (something that Bill Clinton now regrets). In the wake of huge inflation and very low wages, the Orange Revolution took place in 2004 ending with the election of Viktor Yushchenko. At the time of recording (2014) Crimea had just been invaded by Russia. Crimea had been settled with many Russians who had been encouraged to move there by Stalin, but many of the original Tartars had since returned, and in 2014 comprised about 35% of the Crimean population. Interesting, in he light of current events.

In the Shadows of Utopia Episode 11 Mao’s Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution I listened to this just after reading Linda Jaivn’s book Bombard the Headquarters (my review here), and this makes a really good companion listen. In fact, well done young Lachlan, because this episode hangs together really well. He points out that the Cultural Revolution, as well as changing China, also acted as a test of loyalty of Mao’s officials. He draws some parallels with different phases of the French Revolution, and sees the dispersal of young people into the provinces as a way of reining the revolution back in. He reminds us of the Sino/Soviet conflicts, and suggests that China’s rapprochement with the US was an example of ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ in action.

99% Invisible All About That Bass I’ve started playing bass ukulele- yes, there is such a thing- so this episode really interested me. It’s about the Roland 808 drum machine, which apparently is ubiquitous- even (drummer) Phil Collins used one on ‘One More Night’. When the Roland 808 was released in 1980 it cost $1200 (about $4600 in today’s currency), and was intended to replace drummers. It was when they realized that they could use the ‘decay’ function to replicate the bass and kick drum sound that the Roland 808 gave the bass the prominence that it now has in hip-hop and R&B.

The Human Subject (BBC) The Boy with an Ice Pick in His Brain. Actually, despite all the warnings about gruesome details that preface this episode, I didn’t find it particularly disturbing. It’s about Dr Walter Freeman, who championed the lobotomy process throughout the US, even by psychiatrists whose surgical skills must be questionable. The Boy with the Ice Pick in his brain was 12 year old Howard Dully whose step-mother arranged to have a lobotomy for ‘childhood schizophrenia’ (which sounded just like 12 year old cussedness to me). It was Freeman who operated on Rosemary Kennedy as a 23 year old, who never recovered from the surgery.

‘A Spot of Bother’ by Mark Haddon

2007, 503 p.

I read in succession two books that start off with the sudden death of a middle aged man, and writing this review some time (too long) after reading the book, I find myself getting confused between this book and J. R. Rowling’s The Casual Vacancy (reviewed here). Both are set in England, both have unlikeable characters and treacherous families, and neither shows off the author’s skills to best effect.

George is a 61 year old retiree who would certainly qualify for the Dull Men’s Club. The secret of contentment, he thinks, lies in ignoring many things completely. Things like his wife’s affair with his ex-colleague or the wisdom of his daughter marrying a man who seems to be nearly as dull as George is. But when George discovers a lesion on his hip, he is convinced that it is cancer and spirals off into his own whirlpool of paranoia, planning to kill himself or, literally, to take matters into his own hands. Meanwhile, his wife Jean is recapturing her lost youth with George’s business partner David, an affair that she sees as something romantic and beautiful, but which, when George discovers them having sex, is unattractive and embarrassing between two “old people”. When George and Jean learn that their daughter Kate is going to marry Ray, a tradesman with a strong northern accent, they both disapprove, as does Kate’s gay brother Jamie. Somehow weddings often seem to bring out the worst in families. Jean’s meddling, Jamie’s huffiness over whether his boyfriend Tony should be invited and how he will be received, and tension and uncertainties between Kate and Ray make this whole wedding seem a disaster in waiting. The whole thing teeters into farce, which undermines somewhat the rather acute and poignant observations that Haddon had made along the way.

The story is told from the varying perspectives of the characters, each of them rationalizing their stance, as we all do. What Haddon does well is butt these perspectives up against each other, challenging the veracity of the various points of view. Jean, for instance, sees herself as a vibrant and attractive older woman, where George sees her as a slightly repellent, plump, aging woman with witch-like hair. George sees himself as a slightly ironic, logical older man, where Jean sees him as a rather pathetic, lost retiree looking for relevance. Kate values Ray for how good he is with her young son Jacob; Ray is bemused by how angry Kate is all the time.

This book had none of the endearing charm of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, and it felt as if it could have been written by any number of middle-ranking English authors. The ending was just ridiculous, and I finished the too-lengthy book – and its unlikeable characters- feeling as if I was glad to leave them all behind.

My rating: 6/10

Sourced from: ex- CAE Bookgroups stock

Read because: my ex-CAE Ladies Who Say Oooh Bookgroup chose it from the dregs of the books left over now that CAE has closed.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 16-23 August 2025

The Rest is History Episode 583 The Lion, the Priest and the Parlourmaids: A 1930s Sex Scandal The story of Harold Davidson, the Rector of Stiffkey (sometimes pronounced ‘stuckey’ for some insane English reason) challenges you as a listener to either judge him with the obloquy he deserves, or to take a more ‘charitable’ view of him as a naive man mis-cast into the clerical profession, who had been framed and punished unjustly. He was a Church of England minister who took an intense interest in young girls of easy virtue, and he became known as the ‘Prostitutes’ Padre’. He ended up being defrocked, after the Bishop of Norwich launched proceedings against him for immorality. His courtcase revealed multiple occasions of pestering, but there was only one main witness against him. Always a frustrated stage-performer, he spent the rest of his life as a Blackpool showman trying to raise the money to appeal his case, ending up being mauled by a lion as part of the sideshow. Tom and Dominic become a little silly during this episode, but it does lend itself to farce.

History’s Heroes. I must admit that I’m a bit wary of any podcast that proclaims to deal with ‘heroes’, but I was interested in the story of NZ plastic surgeon Harold Gillies, the subject of Saving Face with Harold Gillies, a two-part episode. Born in New Zealand, he trained and lived in England, and when World War I broke out, he went to the front where he worked on men who had suffered the appalling facial injuries, many of which were sustained when raising their heads above the trenches. World War I changed the nature of war: 300 men in 1914 were equivalent to 60,000 in Napoleon’s time. On the front, he recognized the importance of the work of dentists, who were better at facial reconstruction than doctors were, He pioneered the use of the ‘flap’, where skin from one part of the body was reattached to other parts of the body over a long series of surgeries (although looking at the Wikipedia entry, I don’t know that the results of the flap were much better than the original surgery). In fact, the results are so poor that perhaps Harold Gillies could be considered by the The Human Subject podcast, which looks at some of the barbarities that were carried out in the name of science. After the war, he moved into cosmetic surgery and gender reassignment surgery – indeed he carried out among the first female-male and male-female surgeries. The second episode features interviews with his son and grandson, who query somewhat the heroic status awarded to Harold Gillies, while still maintaining pride in their connection to him.

El Hilo. I’ve been appalled looking at the prison regime introduced to El Salvador by Nayib Bukele, and this 6-part series does a really good dive (if very critical) into Bukele and his policies. I’m listening to it in Spanish, and reading the Spanish transcript. However, it is possible to get an English translation of each episode here. Episode 1: Someone Like Bukule (link is to the English translation) goes to his childhood as the grandson of Palestinian immigrants, and the son of a politically engaged businessman and commentator. His political career started off with a mayoral position in Nuevo Cuscatlán, before moving on to become the mayor of San Salvador. Episode 2 Move Fast and Break Things (Muévete rápido, rompe cosas) (I don’t think there’s an English transcript) follows his career as he becomes the President, breaking the hold of the Left on the presidency by presenting himself as an outsider to the political system (even though he had been involved in mayoral politics). Despite making many populist promises during the campaign, then warns of “bitter medicine” required to solve the economic and social problems of El Salvador.

Global Roaming (ABC) And blow me down if Geraldine and Hamish don’t devote this week’s episode to Nayib Bukele as well. Meet the ‘World’s Coolest Dictator’ features an interview with Vera Bergengruen who is one of the few Western journalists to have interviewed Bukele for a TIME profile. She emphasizes Bukele’s ‘poster child’ status amongst other Latin American countries moving to the right, and his stratospheric popularity, even among families that have a family member incarcerated in his terrible prison system. Good, but it lacks the depth of the El Hilo series (only to be expected as this is a single half-hour episode compared with six one-hour episodes)

Missing in the Amazon (Guardian) Episode 5: The Fightback. In Lula da Silva’s first presidency, there had been a 50% reduction in deforestation. When he returned to the presidency in 2023, it was the closest election result in Brazilian history. After Bolsonaro had given carte blanche to illegal operations in the Amazon, Lula reactivated the special forces to apprehend the mining barges and illegal fishing. However, poverty, the size of the Amazon and organized crime mean that there are low sentences and big money. Pelado was a mid-level commander in an operation conducted by Ruben Villar (there are different versions of his name) AKA ‘Colombia’, a warlord withh strong political connections. Will he ever face court? (update as of 22/7/25- The Federal Court of Amazonas has accepted the prosecutors’ case against ‘Colombia’ ) Episode 6: The Frontline In June 2025 Dom’s book How to Save the Amazon was published. Ironically, despite Lula, it is just as dangerous today and if Dom and Bruno embarked on the same expedition, there would probably be the same result. His friend Betto thinks that Lula has squandered the opportunity to confront organized crime, while others are more optimistic, hoping that Lula wins the next election in 2026.

Off again

Of for a little trip to Vietnam, where I will meet up with Dean, Jesse and the granddaughters. Once again, you can join me at https://landofincreasingsunshine.wordpress.com/

See you on the other side.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 8-15 August 2025

Missing in the Amazon (Guardian) Episode 3: The protector and the poacher looks at Bruno Pereira, the indigenous expert who was killed along with Dom Phillips on the Javari river in western Brazil. Pereira was born in the city, but was recruited to work with the forest people. When he was dismissed from FUNAI (National Indigenous People Foundation) , an indigenous rights foundation, he worked with EVU, established by his colleague Betto (?) and they patrolled the river, destroying the boats of illegal miners and poachers. One of those poachers was Pelado (Amarildo da Costa de Oliveira) who had been part of the settler colonization of indigenous areas that was encouraged by the military dictatorship in the 1960s until they were evicted from Indigenous areas in the 1980s. Seething with resentment, and emboldened by Bolsonaro’s anti-Indigenous policies, Pelado lived in a river-side village, where Dom and Bruno were shot. Episode 4: The Ambush is a first-person account by Dom Phillips’ colleague at the Guardian, Tom Phillips (similar name, no relation) who was one of the people who searched the Javari river for the missing men. From the police interviews with Pelado and his brother Oseney da Costa de Oliveira, we learn that the men were ambushed and shot at Pelado’s village, with their bodies moved several times to hide them from discovery.

Rear Vision (ABC) The Rise of Vladimir Putin Putin has been in power for 25 years and has moulded himself to the times. He came to power promising order after the orgy of corruption by the oligarchs in the wake of the dissolution of the USSR, then when economically things picked up with oil exports etc. he oversaw a prosperous economy. But in the last few years he has been a war president, defining himself as anti-Europe, anti-woke, anti-liberal. He has, however, always been popular, with his approval ratings (to the extent that you could trust them) not dropping below 60%. Although he initially had the support of the anti-oligarch middle class, many people felt that they had been sold a pup with his power-swap with Medvedev, he has maintained authority and popularity. The current situation is a consequence of the end of the Cold War, but instead the West is moving more towards Russian ideas, with the rise of the hard right across the world. The episode features Arkady OstrovskyRussian editor for The Economist magazine, Ivan Nechepurenkojournalist with the Moscow bureau of the New York Times and Joshua Keating, staff writer at Slate magazine.

Witness History St Teresa of Avila’s severed hand Well, when you dig up a body and it hasn’t decomposed, of course you’ll chop off its hand as a relic. Especially if it’s the hand of St Teresa of Avila. Somehow it ended up in a convent in Ronda, where it stayed until General Franco took it and kept it in his bedchamber “looking after it” during the war and then asking to keep it until the end of his reign. The sisters of the convent didn’t get it back until 1976. It was on display in its special case, with rings on the fingers. I visited Ronda back in July 2018 but I didn’t know about this relic: I visited a church there, but obviously the wrong one. In Feb 2024 the four remaining sisters were advertising for other Carmelite nuns to come there because it was in danger of closing – I wonder if it did? It seems to still be going.

‘The Robin Hood Guerillas: The Epic Journey of Uruguay’s Tupamaros’ by Pablo Brum

2014, 402 p.

I’ve been dipping into books about Uruguay- a place I’ve never been- and about Jose (‘Pepe’) Mujica, the ex-President of Uruguay who died recently. I haven’t been able to find many English-language books about the Tupamaros, especially recent ones, and this book, written in 2014, seemed to be as recent as I was going to find. I know little about the historiography of Latin America, and Uruguay in particular, or the author (who was/is an American international security analyst – whatever that is) so I can only take the book on its own terms. To my admittedly untrained eye, the book seemed to be fairly even-handed, and easily read by a newcomer to the area, although an index for the huge range of characters would have been useful.

So the Tupamaros- what a strange name. This Marxist-Leninist urban guerilla group took its name from Tupac Amaru II, the leader of a failed Andean rebellion against the Spanish in Peru, who was executed in 1781. The group, more properly known as Movimiento de Liberación Nacional – Tupamaros, MLN-T formed in the early 1960s, and one of their first acts was to steal weapons and ammunition from the Tiro Suizo, a shooting range in Colonia, Uruguay. The weapons, supplemented by stolen police uniforms, enabled them to conduct a range of audacious hold-ups and kidnappings which earned them the sobriquet ‘The Robin Hood Guerillas’. Their mode was ‘armed propaganda’ which combined the mostly harmless brandishing of weapons with a healthy (if somewhat tedious) dose of ideology and propaganda to which they subjected their victims. At first there was, indeed, a Robin Hood element, when they combined social justice and retribution against corruption in their criminal activities, often undertaken both as a form of armed propaganda and in order to procure more weapons, ammunition and money to conduct further raids.

Despite admiration of both the Cuban and Chinese revolutions, and the sympathy the leaders had for the agricultural workers (particularly by Raul Sendic and Jose Mujica) it was decided that they would eschew the examples of other peasant-based revolutions and instead undertaken urban guerilla action. This was largely a result of geography: as a small, flat country there were none of the mountain hideaways that guerillas could melt into, and at times when both Brazil and Argentina had right-wing governments, they could not count on fleeing over the border.

At first, they seemed to have widespread, if often tacit support. They could call on doctors to repair their injuries, and lawyers, bank officials, government employees and others enabled them to infiltrate and provide intelligence about their targets. Brum reveals a grudging admiration for the audacity of their raids, and their sheer ingenuity and logistical planning of escapes when the police rounded them up. Their escapes- especially when 100 prisoners tunnelled out of the Punta Carretas – made them seem invincible (in much the same way, unfortunately, as the drug cartels in South America have seemed inthe past).

Brum spends some time on Alejandro Otero, the police commissioner with formidable MLN-hunting skills, who in a Javier/Jean Valjean type of struggle with the Tupumaros, exhibited a mixture of fixation and grudging admiration, as did the Tupumaros with him.

But over time, as more of the original Tupamaros were arrested or fled into exile, the movement became more violent. They lost support when their kidnap hostages were murdered, rather than set free after a few months, and in many ways their actions prompted the takeover of the military, albeit with the acquiescence of the civil authorities. The murder of rural labourer, Pascasio Baez, by lethal injection of penothal also cost them support.

Once popular support leached away from them, and the grip of the military hardened, the Tupumaros disappeared from the headlines. But Brum follows them into their imprisonment, divided into groups of three, held in prisons with varying degrees of cruelty.

I gather that Brum makes some contested points in this book. He argues that it was not certain-indeed, he leans towards refuting- that U.S. government official Dan Mitrione, who was murdered in 1970, actually trained the police in torture methods. He suggests that during 1972 and 1985, when the nine most prominent Tupamaros were imprisoned, and moved from one military base to another, the Tupamaros themselves sent out feelers to the very military that was imprisoning them, to see if they could work together.

He finishes his book with a ‘where-are-they-now’ survey, current as of 2014. Raul Sendic, the icon of the Tupamaros, suffered appalling facial injuries in a shoot-out, and died in 1989. Some, like Jorge Zabalaz and Mauricio Rosencof retained their radicalism. Brum is bemused, and amused, by the popularity of Jose Mujica that saw him become no less than President. As he points out, a surprising number of the players in the 1970s still had sons involved in politics fifty years later.

Brum criticizes the barbarity on both sides- on the part of the Tupamaros who drifted away from the somewhat romantic (and romanticized) view of the Robin Hood guerilla, and on the part of the military who honed their cruelty on the nine Tupamaros leaders under their control. Despite the audacity and logistic brilliance of their early exploits, Brum’s linking of them with their ideological descendants like the Californian Symbionese Liberation Army who kidnapped Patty Hearst, or the Weather Underground, or the urban guerilla Rote Armee Fraktion in Germany, or the Italian Brigate Rosse is rather chilling. He closes his book with the observation that, despite Mujica’s proclamation that he “fought for a fatherland for all”

…many individuals were left behind in shootings, executions, and torture chambers: civilians, insurgents, policemen, and soldiers. For them there really was no more fatherland.

I enjoyed this book, although I was mystified by the curious insertions of #### and ++++++ to denote endnotes, as well as nearly 600 footnotes throughout the text. It was supportive of a reader with little knowledge, and he established the major characters sufficiently clearly that you could trace them throughout the narrative, although they threatened to be swamped by so many minor characters mentioned in person. Jose Mujica, whom I admire, once said

I am still a Tupumaro. I never stopped being one. A Tupumaro is someone who rebels against injustice.

After reading this book, I think I understand a little better what he meant.

My rating: 8/10

Sourced from: purchased Kindle book