‘Australian Gospel’ by Lech Blaine

2024, 358 p.

Sometimes a memoir says more by what it doesn’t say. The subtitle of this book is ‘A Family Saga’, and saga it certainly is, as it tells the long, drawn-out struggle between birth parents and Christian fundamentalist fanatics Michael and Mary Shelley and the foster parents of their three of their children, Tom and Lenore Blaine. It came as a rather guilty relief when Michael and Mary finally die by the end of the book, and you can let go of the breath that you have been holding and think “well, thank God that’s over”.

This is not a straight generation-to-generation family saga. The book starts in 1983 when Michael Shelley, accompanied by a 19 year old hitchhiker Glen, burst into the house of Fran and Neil Williams, the foster parents of Michael’s three year old son Elijah. To the background theme song of Play School, Michael and Glen literally snatched Elijah in front of his foster sisters, Debbie, Linda and Cindy, and took him back to join Mary Shelley as they continued on their peripatetic life proclaiming God’s providence and sponging on everyone they met. We don’t meet this event again until about a third of the way through the book, after we have learned of the family tree, history and relationships of the four main protagonists- the brilliant, egotistical Michael Shelley; his psychotic and dependent wife Carole Newgrosh who changes her name to Mary Shelley on her husband’s instructions; rough-and-tumble, overweight and raucous Tom Blaine; and his wife the conscientious Lenore Meurant who suffers miscarriage after miscarriage and whose love for children can encompass an ever-increasing number of children as foster carer

As Blaine notes in the preface, he wasn’t around for much of the action of this story, which had hardened into deep ruts of suspicion and wariness by the time he was born as Michael and Lenore’s only biological child. . The youngest child in the family, he is more observer than participant as Michael and Mary Shelley continue to confront the Blaine family demanding the return of their children, causing multiple shifts of residence as Tom buys up one hotel after another, a successful publican who builds up failing hotels into successful concerns.

Michael and Mary have multiple court appearance for harassment and stalking, not just of the Blaines but also of Queensland politicians who they hoped would take up their case- a strange way of trying to win support. Within the strict tunnel vision of their religion, they are quick to label women lesbians and men pedophiles. When they do manage to make contact with their children separately, they soon alienate them by their bitterness against the Blaines and their messianic fundamentalism.

Class is not directly addressed in this memoir, but it pervades it throughout. Both Michael and Mary Shelley had enjoyed privileged upbringings in Sydney, beautiful Mary appearing in the women’s magazines as the wife of singer Lionel Long, before meeting Michael Shelley. Tom and his hotels, with the Rugby trophies on the walls, the alcohol and the pokies are everything that Michael Shelley abhors, seeing it not only as evil but also working-class and demeaning. Certainly, contraception seems to be completely unknown throughout, as the Blaine/Shelley children grow up into adulthood with unplanned pregnancies catapulting them into responsibilities that they treat with varying degrees of maturity and avoidance. As their adult personalities emerge, so too does mental illness and addiction, but who can tell if it’s “in the blood” or a result of the constant evasion and escape prompted by yet another arrival of the Shelleys on their doorstep.

There is no grand plot twist at the end- or even a plot at all, for that matter- and the book is more observation than analysis. The book moves chronologically, focussing on one character and then another, with a number of small sub-chapters, each with its own subheading subsumed into larger chapters, which are in turn organized into three parts. The author withholds judgement, trying to present the perspective of each of his characters, and leaving the reader to pose the questions: what is a family? whose rights are paramount? what does it mean to be a parent? how well has the child protection system worked here? are we doomed to repeat the destructive patterns of our parents? can trauma ever be shaken off? is ‘alternative’ parenting abuse or just a choice?

What comes over most strongly is love – as a form of obsession and persistence, in the case of the Shelleys, or as a glowing coal of acceptance and protection, in the case of the Blaines. Although the author has withheld judgment, he hasn’t withheld his own gratitude and love for what Tom and Lenore Blaine gave to all of their children, himself included.

My rating: 9/10

Sourced from: Purchased from Ladyhawke Books, Ivanhoe

Read because: Ivanhoe Reading Circle selection.

Movie: The Stranger

I read ‘The Stranger’ many, many years ago- although the version I read was called ‘The Outsider’. I couldn’t really remember all that much about the book except Meursault’s rather listless detachment with everything. The film places rather more emphasis on his relationship with Marie than I remembered, and the woman abused by his neighbour Raymond is given a name here- Djemila. The film finishes with her, rather than him.

I know that the director decided to shoot it in black and white to convey heat, but I don’t know that it worked that well for me. The water even looked choppy and cool at one stage (although it probably wasn’t). I would have liked to have seen it in a stark, dazzling white heat in colour, instead. It is subtitled, but there is relatively little dialogue and the subtitles were easy to keep up with.

My rating: 7/10

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 24-30 April 2026

The Rest is History Episode 645 The Fall of the Incas: Massacre in the Andes (Part 2) What happened when the Spanish conquistadors lead by Francisco Pizarro came face to face with the ruthless emperor of the Incan Empire, Atahualpa? How did the Incas treat their strange, pale, alien visitors with their horses? And, why did a brutal, bloody fight to the death break out between the two sides after the meeting? In 1532 Pizarro read the ‘Requirement’ which legally bound the Incas to submit to vassalage and established a municipality which made their conquest legal. Pizarro then headed off with 168 men, few of whom were trained soldiers, while the Incas were checking them out from a distance. Atahualpa thought that the Spanish could be useful in the Civil War with his brother. A meeting between Pizarro’s brother, de Soto and Atahualpa agreed to meet the following day. Atahualpa knew that the Spanish were outnumbered and the horses were of great interest to him. After delays, the meeting finally took place in a square. Atahualpa dropped a book (a bible?) and this was the prompt for a massacre which saw many dead and Atahualpa taken captive. There’s shades of Mexico here, and perhaps the historiography has confused Mexican and Inca conquest.

Foundling Episode 4 and 5 The Fallout. SPOILERS Despite her birth-mother warning Jess to consider the effect of her investigations on the later families created by her parents, Jess then searches for her father. She had done a DNA test with Ancestry, but had no success. She then went with a different company and tracked down her father’s family. (It just goes to show how the commodification of DNA testing means that you can’t get definitive results without subscribing to several services- just like streaming. And because it can identify you through your relatives, even if you haven’t submitted your own sample, there’s no escape). Jess encounters Lewis, her father, and his wife Debbie who was completely unaware of any extra-marital relationship between her husband and Jennifer, and their children. His wife is very upset, and so too is their psychologically-fragile daughter Chloe, when she finds out that Jennifer has been her mental health nurse. In best journalistic fashion the podcasters claim that they’re not making insinuations that the discovery had such a drastic effect on Chloe, but they are really.

From Our Own Correspondent (BBC) I love Foreign Correspondent reports, and this weekly program brings BBC correspondents from all over the world. In the episode of 25 April 2026 Kate Adie introduces dispatches from Pakistan, the Turkey-Iran border, Kenya, Ukraine, and Paraguay. Why was Pakistan chosen as the host of peace talks between the US and Iran? It’s a question some in Islamabad have been asking themselves – and has fired-up a sense of national pride. Caroline Davies has watched on as the country gets ready for another round of negotiations. When the war in Iran began, there was a sense of jubilation among some Iranians, who had long-dreamed of the regime falling. Now that seems like a distant reality, and the mood is changing. BBC Persian’s Omid Montazeri has been on the Turkey-Iran border, where he has found attitudes towards the war are shifting. This weekend marks the 40th anniversary of the nuclear disaster in Chernobyl, which remains the world’s worst nuclear accident. Jordan Dunbar visited the city of Slavutych in Northern Ukraine, which was purpose built to rehouse workers evacuated from the power plant city of Pripyat – and recounts his search for a DJ legend of the 1980s. In northern Kenya farmers and their families are suffering the effects of consecutive seasons of low rainfall. A new report estimates around 400,000 people are experiencing acute levels of hunger. Sammy Awami reports from Turkana, one of the worst affected areas. And the semi-arid lowlands of the Gran Chaco span an area of around 280 thousand miles across South America – more than half of that is in Argentina, a third in Paraguay and the remainder in Bolivia. It’s the region’s second-largest forest ecosystem after the Amazon – and is also home to a wide range of animal, bird and plant species – as Sara Wheeler discovered.

How Did We Get Here? Israel and the Palestinians Episode 4 The Balfour Declaration to the Arab Revolt. In the fourth of ten programmes exploring the origins and tracing the history of the Middle East conflict, presenter Jonny Dymond is joined by Gudrun Kraemer, Professor of Islamic Studies at the Free University of Berlin (a female voice at last!), author and historian James Barr and Eugene Rogan, Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at Oxford University. (No Simon Sebag Montefiore this time!) At the end of 1917 the British troops took Palestine. The Balfour Declaration, just 67 words long, expressed support for a Jewish ‘national home’- but not a State. It was largely designed to attract Jewish support for Britain’s war aims. Britain was promising land that it didn’t own to a people who didn’t live there and the majority of Arabs rejected it outright. There was a series of riots during the interwar years because of the purchase of land by Zionists and the influx of Jewish migrants which was changing the demography of Palestine. The Peel Commission report of 1937, held after the Arab Revolt, and its subsequent White Paper partitioned the northern part of Palestine for a Jewish state (first time Britain had been talking about a ‘state’) and limited the amount of Jewish immigration, and the rest of Palestine was to be annexed to Transjordan, another British mandate- an early form of ‘two-state solution’. ‘Independence’ was promised to the Palestinians in ten years, but it was not really independence. The Jewish population saw the White Paper as a betrayal, but Britain saw the quelling of the Arab Revolt as a way of moving more soldiers back to Europe where they were needed in the fight against Germany.

The Book Show In Episode 4: Hamnet:Love Grief and Motherhood Dominic and Tabby discussed Maggie O’Farrell’s Hamnet and the film. I was surprised by how much Dominic enjoyed the book, which he gave a 9/10 (although he wasn’t so impressed with the film, to which he gave 6/10). Tabitha loved it too, giving the book 10/10 and 8.5/10 to the film. I was struck again, hearing them read extracts from the book, how beautifully written it is.

‘The Dream Hotel’ by Laila Lalami

2025, 322 p.

At the moment there’s a Senate inquiry into the new computer Integrated Assessment Tool that is being used to assess eligibility and assign funding levels for aged care service. It is completely automated, and there is no human over-ride function when the algorithm spits out an assessment that is inappropriate, insufficient or just plain wrong. At the inquiry, the first assistant secretary of the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, Robert Day, said

The no override comes from the fact that that is an objective outcome….If you have these scores from your assessment, you get this level of classification … there’s no discretionary element (Guardian, 3 April 2026)

SPOILERS

I was reminded of this when reading Laila Lalami’s The Dream Hotel. My library has designated it ‘Science Fiction’, but there’s not much science fiction about it: it’s just an extrapolation of what is already here. Set in an alternative present day and in response to moral panic about the rising crime rate, The Risk Assessment Administration has been charged with investigating suspicious individuals in order to prevent future crimes, and it can draw on myriad data sources in order to do so. American citizen Sara Hussein is pulled from the arrivals line at the airport because her risk score is too high. An archivist by training, she has been attending a conference, and she bristles and pushes back at being flagged as a risk. The risk assessment has picked up on a complaint from a fellow passenger on the plane who was off-loaded before take-off because she assisted him when he was having trouble breathing; her response that her employer paid for her flight was questioned because, technically, she had not yet submitted the receipts to recoup her expenses. But most damaging of all for her assessment was the information that the authorities could access from her Dreamsaver, a device that she -along with many other Americans- used to maximize the value from her sleep. As the mother of young twins, trying to keep her career afloat, she had turned to this device to overcome her insomnia and although she didn’t realize it, there among the terms and conditions was her permission for the data to be handed on to a third party if required by a legal enforcement authority. Her dreams revealed a propensity to violence, they claimed, and so she needed to be assessed further in Madison Retention Centre.

So started her months-long stint in an ‘retention centre’ which increasingly became prison-like with 24 hour surveillance, curtailed freedoms presented as ‘privileges’, and enforced work. The organization contracted to run the Madison retention centre, Safe-X Inc., has its own internal economy. It has contracts with outside clients like film studios to have AI generated video content assessed for its verisimilitude; it has its internal laundry and catering facilities which fall under Safe-X budgets. Communications are provided and monitored by the AI-driven PostPal; there is a commissariat where Residents could purchase goods from their own money or from funds provided by their families. She can receive visitors, but the scheduling program is capricious, cancelling her visits without any recourse. Her Dreamsaver is monitored daily, and periods of detention could be extended at whim by the Attendants. In the narrative, you (and she) are never quite sure what is dream, or increasingly nightmare, and what is real.

What seems to be a Kafka-esque and dystopian situation does come to an end- the book has an ending, after all- when she resists, using time-worn tactics of strike and solidarity. In fact, the book is almost optimistic in its ending:

…isolation is the opposite of salvation…she owes her release to the women who joined together to say not….Freedom isn’t a blank slate..[it] is teeming and complicated and, yes, risky, and it can only be written in the company of others…This is what Madison has given her, even as it has taken so much from her- the knowledge that she isn’t alone, that she doesn’t have to be. (p. 321,322)

This is a fantastic book. I only had ten pages to go to the end, and so I sat on the station as my train went past, wanting to finish it. It seems that so many articles and events are converging: I just read Anna Krein’s The screens that ate school, from The Monthly, 2020; at a recent appointment my doctor asked me if I would agree to HeidiAi Co Pilot for Modern Healthcare. Do I read the screen after screen of Terms and Conditions? Did I take the doctor’s word that the recording of my appointment wouldn’t go any further than her computer? Do parents have the courage to push back against Google and Apple programs in their schools? No, no and no. This book isn’t Science Fiction: it’s a warning.

My rating: 9/10

Sourced from: Yarra Plenty Regional Library

Read because: I had read excellent reviews of it.

Six Degrees of Separation: From Wild Dark Shore to Wild Island.

It’s the start of the month again – ye Gods! in May already- so it’s Six Degrees of Separation time. This meme, hosted by Kate at Books Are My Favourite and Best involves her choosing a starting book, then you linking the titles or themes of six other books. Have I read her starting book Wild Dark Shore? Of course not.

  1. Come Inside by G. L. Osborne. I gather that Wild Dark Shore is about a shipwreck, and so is Come Inside, set in Western Australia. A young girl is rescued by a young man after being swept ashore as the only survivor after a shipwreck in 1887. She is unable to remember her earlier life, and her story becomes part of the local folklore, heavily mined by the press at the time, a series of oral histories in the 1940s and then centenary publications a hundred years later. You can read my review here.
  2. The Company by Arabella Edge is a novel based on the shipwreck of the Batavia, which also foundered on the West Australian coast. It is told in the present tense voice of Jeronimus Corneliz, one of the men who took charge after the senior officers left the shipwrecked passengers ashore while they went off in search of water. Rather gruesome.
  3. That Deadman Dance by Kim Scott is also set in Western Australia, and it tells the fictionalized story of first contact between the Noongar peopole. We learn early in the book that Bobby Wabalanginy , the main character, will end up a dishevelled busker-type, entertaining tourists with a patter that combines history, pathos and showmanship. The book opens in 1833-5 with Bobby already ensconced in among the whalers and early settlers on the Western Australian coast. It then backtracks to 1826-30 with first contact, a spearing, accommodation and wariness, and the actions of Dr Cross – a good man who trod carefully in this strange and old land, remembered kindly by the Noongah people who knew him, and claimed and acclaimed as a venerable ‘old pioneer’ by subsequent white settlers who did not. Then forward again to 1836-8 in Part III, followed by 1841-44 in Part IV. There’s an increasing sense of foreboding as the book unfolds. You can read my review here.
  4. Dancing With Strangers by my favourite historian Inga Clendinnen. It’s a contact story too, this time set in Sydney Cove with the arrival of the first fleet, and even though it’s on the other side of the country, it’s as if first contact is following a tragic script.
  5. Truganina by Cassandra Pybus follows that tragic script too, although it is set in Van Diemen’s Land rather than the mainland. In Pybus’ Truganini – as distinct from the ‘last Tasmanian aborigine’ Truganini- we have a flesh-and-blood woman who swims and dives, who struggles through harsh landscapes and complains of having to walk instead of taking the boat, has friendships, loves children, uses her body and her sexuality to get what she wants, and resists being corralled into Chief Protector Robinson’s vision of a compliant, dying race. You can read my review here.
  6. And in a nice bit of symmetry, I end up with Wild Island by Jennifer Livett. It’s set in Van Diemens Land as well, and it’s a riff on Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre. The opening pages have two lists of characters: the first a list of historical characters drawn from the real-life inhabitants of Van Diemen’s Land in the late 1830s and early 1840s; and the second a list of fictional characters, some of whom have been taken from Jane Eyre, others created to mingle with the real-life Hobartians.  The research for this book is exhaustive- and exhausting.  In her acknowledgments at the rear of the book, the author mentions that this book has been forty years in gestation, and I believe it. You can read my review here.

I seem to have spent a lot of time on beaches and shipwrecks in Colonial Australia. But I’m rather pleased with myself being able to link the opening and closing books so well, even if I had to contort myself somewhat to do so!

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 16-23 April 2026

Foundling. Episodes 1-3 This is a six-part series, presented by journalist Lucy Greenwell and I binge-listened to the first three episodes. Greenwell remembered a story about a baby that was found on the verge in a deserted lane in her village in October 1987. The mother was never found and the baby, Jess, was placed for adoption. So, some 40 years later, Greenwell goes in search of Jess, and when she finds her, Jess is already wondering about her own origins. Jess does a DNA test, and she and Greenwell go back to the village to talk to people who were living there at the time, and one of the villagers suggests that she look at the young women who were working there as nannies at the time. When Jess receives the DNA results, Greenwell realizes that, as a child, she actually knew Jess’ mother who was acting as a nanny in a neighbouring house. Jess finds a half-sister and discovers her mother, but it is a complex relationship that doesn’t turn out as she thought it would.

The Rest is History Episode 644 The Fall of the Incas: Empire of Gold (Part 1) I must confess that I’m not absolutely clear about the Aztecs and the Incas, and I find from this episode that many historians and chroniclers of the time weren’t either, as similar themes and events occur in both of them. Somehow 167 men overcame 24 million Incans. The conquest of the Aztecs was the model. Christopher Columbus’ monopoly was abolished, and now anyone could go to Hispaniola if they shared the proceeds with the Crown. There were rival, feuding networks of Conquistadors, hopping from island to island. The Incas were what is now known as Peru, Western Ecuador, a bit of Colombia and Chile, and they were completely geographically isolated, and unaware of the conquest of the Aztecs. The leader of the expedition, Pizarro, was illiterate, strong and austere, compared with Cortez. In 1524 Pizarro and Diego de Almagro set off exploring, but they were unsuccessful and then in 1526 they set off again. His pilot Bartolomé Ruiz went further south, where he encountered a raft, laden with jewels for inter-tribal trade, so they knew that there was great wealth in the country. Pizarro was recalled to Panama but he refused to go, and only 12 men stayed with him. In 1529 Pizarro went back to see King Charles V and was given a franchise, but not for Almagro (which was to cause problems later). In 1530 Pizarro returned with 200 recruits, including his brothers and six Dominican friars. He promised Almagro the country of Chile, and Almagro stayed behind in Panama. Then Hernando de Soto arrived with more men and importantly, the horses, that struck such fear into the Incas. They crossed into modern-day Peru where they learned of the Inca empire that the Incas themselves called ‘The Realms of Four Parts’. They did not have writing, horses or wheels; it was a totalitarian slave-based society with no private property. There had been a recent civil war in 1532 between brothers Atahualpa and Huáscar which devastated the countryside and splintered the elites. This was the environment into which Pizarro and his men appeared.

How Did We Get Here Episode 3: From the Nineteenth Century to World War I In the 1800s there was still no ‘Palestine’ as such. The Ottomans saw their holdings as provinces, with no territorial identities. Jerusalem itself may have had only 2000 inhabitants. The province was Arabic speaking, with some Turks, Frankish merchants, migrants and pilgrims and travellers. Jews constituted about 5% of the population and they mainly lived in scholarly centres. The European powers each had ‘their’ group to support. The French championed the Maronites, the Russians the Orthodox Christians and Britain the Jews. In 1882 Russian persecution saw the sponsorship of Jewish families to move to what was to become Israel by rich families like the Rothschilds and Montefiores. At this point, Hertzel began talking of a ‘Jewish state’ but there was no sustained ‘Palestinian’ resistance at this stage (the term ‘Palestinian’ was coined by the Ottomans in about 1850). It was still a farming community, and large Arab families sold some land to Jewish purchasers. World War I saw the area become strategically interesting to the European powers. The Sykes-Picot agreement envisaged an internationalized Palestine, with defined spheres of influence for the British, French and Russians. Mark Sykes, the British Middle East expert, later distanced himself from the agreement that bore his name. Episode features Hugh Kennedy, Professor of Arabic at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Eugene Rogan, Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at Oxford University, and historian Simon Sebag Montefiore.

Journey Through Time. I decided to journey through time myself, and went back to the first episode hosted by David Olusoga and Sarah Churchwell in April 2025. The Attack That Shook America: German Spies in New York tells the story of the huge explosion on Black Tom Island, an island in New York Harbor next to Liberty Island, since infilled and annexed to Jersey City. The United States was officially neutral, with Germany still operating an Embassy in New York,but the munitions that were stored on the island were mainly exported to the Allies. Von Pappen, who was to reappear on the world stage some 20 years later was working in the German Embassy, and he set up the War Intelligence Centre gathering information in Manhatten. In 1914 Berlin ordered him to sabotage shipping of munitions between US and Europe, and 200 bombings were carried out. Wilson refused to believe that spies were at work, preferring diplomacy. The sinking of the Lusitania caused strong anti-German feeling in US, and Von Pappen was expelled from the US in 1916. Black Tom Island was an obvious target, but no-one tended to take it seriously.

‘The Elegance of the Hedgehog’ by Muriel Barbery

2006/2008 320 p.

Translated from the French by Alison Anderson

I know that this book was on the best seller list for ages several years ago, but somehow or other I missed out on reading it. I think that I had it mixed up with Edmund de Waal’s The Hare with Amber Eyes -both European animals, I guess- and I was surprised to find that it wasn’t a WW2 Jewish family story at all. Instead it is set at some undetermined time -1990s?- in a luxurious Parisian apartment block. Reneé Michel is the concierge there, a job that she she took over from her late husband Lucien after his death.

SPOILERS AHEAD

Outwardly Reneé appears to be a working class menial worker, largely invisible to the residents of the apartment block who see her as little more than one of the amenities of the building, like the elevator. But she is much more than this. A precocious child from a poor family, who was forced to leave school early and marry young, she has a thirst for knowledge of the most esoteric and philosophical kind but she hides her abilities from everyone. Her best and only friend is Manuela, who works as a cleaner in the building. Manuela does not share Reneé’s interests at all, but she is quick, observant, generous with her limited resources and a loyal friend. She also provides cover for Reneé, giving the appearance of two equally humble and uneducated women friends- which of course we know Reneé is not. An equally precocious child lives several floors up, twelve year old Paloma Josse who is a mixture of intellectual superciliousness, ennui and determination to subvert the bourgeois future that awaits her by planning to commit suicide on her thirteenth birthday.

The book is told alternately from the first person perspective of Reneé and Paloma. The author distinguishes the two voices through different fonts, but the narrative voice is strong enough in both of them that there is no need for the visual cues. Both of them are exploring big philosophical questions- Reneé at a more abstract level; Paloma by observing the behaviour of people around her and gradually distancing herself from her avowed intention to set fire to the apartment buildings and kill herself at the same time.

I’ll confess that I found some of the philosophical chapters rather tedious- a long chapter about phenomenology, for example- and until halfway through the book I was wondering whether it was going to go anywhere. But then one of the residents of the apartment block died, and his apartment was purchased and renovated by the wealthy Japanese Kakuro Ozu. A man of refined and simple tastes, and an observer of beauty, he recognizes through small clues that both Reneé and Paloma are intelligent, philosophical women, both hiding their intelligence behind a surface of gruffness and ignorance, in Reneés case or adolescent moodiness and self-centredness in the case of Paloma. Manuela, Reneé, Paloma and Kakuro form a bond to which the apartment residents are completely oblivious.

Kakuro asks Reneé on a date, and with endearing awkwardness she procures a dress through Manuela’s help and goes to the hairdresser for the first time in many years. But she is increasingly uncomfortable at his attention, telling herself that such a cultured and wealthy man could not be interested in a lowly concierge. This, however, is all a defence mechanism, and we learn from her family story that her sister Lisette had died after giving birth to the child of the wealthy employer she had left home for. Shaken by her sister’s death, “Don’t fraternize with rich people if you don’t want to die” had become her watchword, but it was countered by Kakuro’s response “You are not your sister, we can be friends”. Indeed, possibly even more than friends.

I won’t divulge the ending, but it came quickly and out of left field. All of my reservations about the lack of movement and philosophical pretension in the first half of the book were dispelled. It left me in tears, wishing that I could stop the ending and just hold on to the characters for a bit longer.

I am rather mystified by the title though. Paloma watches Reneé and observes:

Madame Michel has the elegance of the hedgehog: on the outside, she’s covered with quills, a real fortress, but my gut feeling is that on the inside, she has the same simple refinement as the hedgehog: a deceptively indolent little creature, fiercely solitary- and terribly elegant. (p.139)

I’m no expert on hedgehogs: indeed, I don’t know if I’ve ever seen one. I must say, though, that ‘elegant’ is not a word I would readily associate with them. Certainly Madame Michele is prickly, solitary, combative and self-contained but elegant?

My rating: 8/10

Read because: Rosanna Readers bookgroup (i.e. ex-CAE) selection through YPRL.

I hear with my little ear: 8-15 April 2026

The Rest is History We were watching The Irish Civil War 3-part series on SBS before it disappeared, I realized that I hadn’t finished listening to the Rest is History series on the Irish Civil War. Episode 581 The Irish Civil War: The Killing of Michael Collins (Part 2) features historian and friend of the podcast Ronan McGreevy. The fighting in Four Courts lasted three days, culminating in the Public Record Office being blown up, thus destroying records going back centuries. The fight moved into the streets outside the GPO. There were more anti-Treaty supporters than Free-State supporters in the IRA, but the Free State had the support and the weaponry of the British government. At the June election in 1922 the anti-Treatys only got 20% of the votes. People just wanted peace. The National army began recruiting heavily, and the Irregulars (i.e. the anti-Treaty IRA) were beaten, so they decided to embark on a guerilla campaign. Collins travelled to Cork, his home county, and visited friends and his brother and spent some time at the pub. Returning back from the pub, they traversed the same route – something you never do in a guerilla war. Did it matter that Michael Collins was killed? He was young, and would have brought dynamism to the Free State. Now it turns nasty with tit-for-tat killings, the expulsion of Protestants, and the sacking of the Big Houses. The Irish Civil War only lasted 11 months and 1400 were killed- and was less damaging that the other civil wars in Europe at the time. It the end, it just petered out, but the IRA didn’t go away- as we know.

How Did We Get Here? (BBC) Israel and the Palestinians 1: From Earliest Times to the Romans This is a 10 part series presented by Jonny Dymond. Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones, Professor in Ancient History at Cardiff University, and historian and author Simon Sebag Montefiore, author of ‘Jerusalem: The Biography’. I was expecting rather more divergence between them, but they tended to agree. The first five books of the Old Testament were set in the Bronze Age around 3000 BCE. ‘The Land’ comprised Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, west of the River Jordan, up to Egypt. They were a People, rather than a Place, and there were other Semitic people there too. The first five books do contain history, but the history serves a theological purpose. By the time we reach the Iron Age, history and archaeology are coming together. King David ruled in 1000 BCE, but there is little archaelogical evidence of a huge temple. There were mixed tribes there, but there was no stark difference between the Jews and others. The Biblical texts talking about Yahweh having a wife were expunged. During Roman times, the right to rule over ‘the land’ was farmed out to client Kings e.g. Herod. In 66CE there was a Jewish riot, and Jerusalem was besieged. In 70CE Titus invaded and destroyed the temple and enslaved the Jewish people. The Siege of Masada in 72 and 73CE was the last gasp of the first Jewish-Roman wars. Now that there was no temple, the Torah became a type of portable temple, and by now they were ‘Jews’ rather ‘Judeans’ (i.e. a geographical identity). However, the early Christians escaped and the Christian community split into two streams, the first headed by James and dominated by Jesus’ family, and the second headed by Paul. In 130-135 CE there was another rebellion against Hadrian, and Judea was renamed Palestine.

Israel and the Palestinians 2: From the Muslim Conquest to the Nineteenth Century. This episode spans the 7th-19th centuries, with historian Simon Sebag Montefiore, author of ‘Jerusalem: The Biography’, and Eugene Rogan, Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at Oxford University. By 7th century and the spread of Christendom , Jerusalem had become a pilgrimage site by Christian tourists. Early Islam turned to Jerusalem (in fact, during prayer they literally turned to Jerusalem rather than Mecca) and Muhammed was said to have ascended from the Temple Mount, but actually he never physically went there. Jerusalem fell to the Arabs in 638 and they were welcomed by both Jews and Christians as they brought relief from the taxation and oppression of the Byzantium rulers. There was no sense of contradiction in embracing the Arabs, because the Arabs did not attempt to suppress the Jewish or Christian religions. Meanwhile, back in Europe, in 1095 Pope Ruban believed that the Christian shrines were in danger. 100,000 men answered the call and although Muslims were the target, there was a massacre of ‘infidels’ including Jews. The Crusaders took Jerusalem in 1099 and killed everyone, but by this time there were only 12,000 crusaders. Saladin fought back and established rule over Greater Syria. The Jews always wanted to return to Zion, but they were in no position to do so because of persecution in Christian countries. In 1517 Selim the Grim conquered the Mamluk Sultanate. Originally Selim was going after the Persians, but then he changed direction and went for the Mamluks instead. There was no sense of ‘Palestine’ at the moment – clan, or city, or religious identity- but not a nation. The Ottomans saw Palestine as being part of Syria, and the ‘Holy Land’ contained Jews and different Christian sects. Suleiman the Magnificent specified that the Jews had to pray in a specified area, and this became the ‘Wall’.

Rear Vision (ABC) Pete Hegseth- war monger or true believer? (broadcast 28 March 2026) Almost as bad as seeing Donald Trump on the war is to see his Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth. I refuse to call him ‘Secretary of War’ because only Congress can change the name of a department. Hegseth was raised in Minnesota and attended Princeton university where he signed up for the Reserve Officers Training Corp. After graduating he worked briefly on Wall Street, before being deployed by the National Guard to Cuba, then Iraq. He was highly critical of the army and the ‘restrictions’ that were imposed on them in both deployments. He returned to New York, and feeling disoriented and lost, he began working with veterans’ organizations: Vets for Freedom and later Concerned Veterans for America, but in both positions there were reports of bullying, rorting and drunkenness. He then worked for Fox News. But then he found God and joined an extreme evangelical group the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches – I’m not sure which is worse really. The guests on this program include Dave Philipps, Military reporter for the New York Times; Jane Mayer, investigative journalist at The New Yorker Magazine; Missy Ryan, Staff Writer at The Atlantic covering national security, foreign policy and defence and Logan Davis, investigative journalist who grew up in the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches.

My ANZAC Day reading 2026

I don’t attend ANZAC Day ceremonies. I was burned by last ANZAC Day ceremony I attended in the early 2000s on the Gold Coast, where I took my adolescent children to a ceremony for the first time, hoping that we would be able to mark the futility of war, an honouring of sacrifice and a commitment to peace. In a big white marquee the local RSL dignitaries berated anyone who opposed Australia’s involvement in one of America’s wars- can’t remember if it was Iraq or Afghanistan- and we left, quietly but with determination never to attend another ANZAC ceremony again. Over the years I have, however, read a fair bit about ANZAC, particularly during the centenary ‘celebrations’, and I usually read an article or two about Gallipoli and ANZAC on the day itself.

This year has been no exception. I read Inside Story’s re-print of Mark Baker’s 2020 piece “My God, it would have been easier than I thought” which argues that Gallipoli was not the pointless disaster that has been portrayed, and that in fact, the Turkish troops were far more vulnerable than is usually acknowledged.

Then I started thinking about Anzac Day in my suburb in 1926, Heidelberg, by which time local Anzac Day commemorations had moved out of the churches, where they had largely been held since the first commemorations in 1916, to public ceremonies around war memorials and in the largest auditoriums available in 1926 – the picture theatres. Although no longer conducted in churches, the 1926 local commemorations still had religious overtones, with all of the Protestant ministers in attendance and taking an active part. But were there Catholic commemorations? What about the Catholic returned soldiers?

And this led me to a M.A. thesis written by Monica Van Gend in 2022 “That all may Justice Share: Sydney Catholics in the interwar years 1919-1929. In this thesis, she challenges Michael McKernan’s assertion that Australian churches became less relevant to Australian society after the war by looking at the Catholic Church (which she refers to as ‘the Church’) in Sydney and its response both during and in the decade following the war.

The shift in universities to imbue theses with beautiful and creative writing has been a slow one, and this thesis has the usual trappings of literature review, theoretical underpinnings etc. Nonetheless, it was easy to read, and I found quite a few things of interest, and several parallels to the current discussion of ‘just war’ and the US government’s pushback to Pope Leo’s warning that God doesn’t listen to the prayers of those who wage war.

I was interested to read that the sectarianism which split Australian society for the following fifty-odd years (and which of course was present right from the start of British settlement) was less potent on the battlefield than I imagined. Notwithstanding Archbishop Mannix’s anti-war stance, there were Catholic chaplains appointed to the battalions in a ratio representing Australian society: 2 Anglican, 1 Catholic, and one other Protestant chaplain. Because of Catholicism’s emphasis on the importance of the sacraments, Catholic chaplains tended to stay close to the troops, where they could hear confession and say Mass prior to a battle or administer the last rites. They gained respect, both from the men and from other chaplains. Sectarian prejudices were far more hard-line on the homefront than on the battlefront itself.

This was reflected in the Protestant response to Pope Benedict XV’s Peace Proposal, issued on August 1, 1917 and blithely ignored by everyone. The Sydney Morning Herald, echoing the view of local Protestants, argued on 17 October 1917 that “On the one side were ranged the champions of human right and liberty, and on the other the lawless henchmen of medieval dynastic despotism” (and you can guess who the lawless henchmen were….) Papal interventions in times of war, and the pushback from some quarters, are obviously nothing new.

And neither was fake news. In August 1914 a pamphlet was circulated around the Forbes NSW area purporting to reproduce an oath by the American catholic group The Knights of Columbus where adherents swore to “denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or State, named Protestant or Liberal, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers”. It was spurious, but it shows that we’re not the only generation exposed to fake news.

Particularly interesting to me was the move within the Catholic church and its organizations, both during the war and after, to promote an Australian patriotism as something worth fighting for, rather than for Empire, especially given the rise of the Irish Free State and the Irish Civil War. To that end, Catholic commemorations of the war did not display the Union Jack, or start or end with the National Anthem, which was then ‘God Save the King’, but with what they called the ‘Australian Anthem’. Sung to our present dirge ‘Advance Australia Fair’, the words are quite different:

1. Australia’s sons! Let us rejoice

For we are strong and free

Defenders of our glorious faith

We guard its liberty.

Our standard high, across the sky,

In Beauty shining there,

Points out the way, wherein we may

Advance Australia Fair

2. Beneath our radiant Southern Cross,

In knighthood’s bond we stand,

To help the weak, to right the wrong,

That truth may rule the land.

For conscience’ sake and Freedom’s cause

That all may justice share,

This is our aim when we acclaim

Advance, Australia Fair!

This is our aim when we acclaim

Advance, Australia Fair!

[Souvenir of the First Annual Communion of the Catholic Returned Sailors’ and Soldiers’ Association of NSW 11 Nov 1928, cited p. 74]

You might recognize the allusion to ‘Knights of the Southern Cross’, a secret society formed after the war to counter the lure of Freemasonry amongst young Catholic men, and the anti-Catholic sentiment fostered by some Masons in their employment practices where it was reported that ‘Catholics need not apply’ for positions. In her footnotes, Van Gend mentions her difficulty in obtaining sources on the Knights of the Southern Cross while writing her thesis because it was a secret society after all, there had been a fire in their offices, and because she was not able to gain access to their archives.

There was a similar impetus for equitable treatment behind the formation of the Catholic Returned Sailors’ and Soldiers’ Association (CRSSA). The mainstream RSL (then Returned Sailors and Soldiers Imperial League of Australia) threw itself behind the Empire – as denoted by its erstwhile title- and their ANZAC Day ceremonies had a strong religious- and particularly Protestant- element. Catholics were forbidden from attending any kind of non-Catholic religious ceremony, and particularly after 1919 ANZAC commemorations were increasingly Protestant in nature. Rather ironically, to promote unity between Protestants and Catholics, the CRSSA was formed to promote a national sentiment that transcended sectarianism. It didn’t work, obviously.

So, an idle speculation about Catholic commemorations in Heidelberg on ANZAC Day led to me sitting down and reading a thesis- not quite how I envisaged spending the day. But definitely worthwhile, nonetheless.

‘Flashlight’ by Susan Choi

2025, 445 p.

It’s ironic that often the books that impress me the most are the ones that I delay writing about. I want the story to percolate for a while, and to really craft my response to it – and then by the time I get round to writing a blog post, it has all faded and I can’t remember enough details. However, in this case, the details (and even the plot) don’t really matter because I wouldn’t tell you about them anyway. For me, one of the real joys of this book was that I really didn’t know where it was going to take me next and by the time I got to the end, I felt as if I had been on a very long journey that crossed time and national boundaries. It’s a mystery, domestic fiction, historical fiction all rolled into one. I really enjoyed it but it really is impossible to talk about it in detail without spoiling it for you.

Suffice to say that it spans the years 1945 to 2008 across Korea, Japan and the United States, with a cast of inscrutable characters. It is based around a family: American born Louisa; her Korean-born father Serk who had been raised in Japan before emigrating to America; her mother Anne, estranged from her family and Anne’s illegitimate son Tobias who re-enters his mother’s life as an adult. There’s defiance and stubbornness, coldness and detachment, as well as a suffocating over-solicitousness and emotional games between the adults of the family. But if you’re someone who feels that you have to like a character, you’re going to be challenged because none of them are particularly likeable.

There are so many themes that come through here: secrecy and shame; language and communication; nationality; belonging; family; identity. They are never once mentioned as themes, but they emerge through the narrative and plot.

The title ‘Flashlight’ is well chosen, not just for the ‘ray of light’ motif that appears throughout the narrative, but also for the writing style. The omniscient third-person narrator moves from one character to another, but unlike many recent books that I have read that barely alight on one character before bouncing off onto the next one, this book stayed with each character for long enough that you felt you knew them, and at least can understand their perspective, even if you don’t share it. In fact, as readers, we know the characters better than the characters know each other, or than the characters even know themselves. Although there are connections between each character and the others, the emphasis is on one character at a time, in the same way that a flashlight can only illuminate one thing in isolation.

It is a long book- 445 pages- but I didn’t feel that it dragged. But perhaps that’s because I’m interested in Korean history: I know that other people in the Reading Circle did feel that it was far too long. It’s ambitious; it has a big story; the writer is control throughout and she takes responsibility for her story, instead of expecting the reader to put the bits together.

If there’s any disappointment here, it’s with myself. I know that I haven’t done justice to this book, because the surprises in the plot are the real strength of the narrative. All I can say is, read it for yourself.

My rating: 9/10

Read because: March selection for the Ivanhoe Reading Circle.