‘I Deliver Parcels in Beijing’ by Hu Anyan

2025,319 p.

Translated by Jack Hargreaves 2025

What a strange book. I picked it up because I had heard that it was a best seller in China, and I was curious to know why. To be honest, having finished it, I still don’t know why this memoir was such a runaway success there, and who its Chinese readers might be.

The story itself is quite simple. The author is a young college-graduate who moves from home to take up a series of poorly-paid unskilled positions over a twenty-year period. His jobs include working in a logistics firm unpacking and packing items, delivering parcels for several courier companies, working in a hotel restaurant, selling bicycles, doing computer-aided artwork on comics, working in a bakery and working in his own companies selling clothes in a shopping mall. As he shifts from province to province seeking work, his accommodation often consists of an apartment partitioned into 5 sq metre ‘rooms’ with only space for a bed and a desk with shared bathroom facilities and only sometimes kitchen facilities. Sometimes he sleeps at the workplace. When working at the bicycle shop, for a 72 hour week, his rent was 1500 yuan per month, leaving him 2000 yuan per month to live on. In some of his jobs, food was provided, although often it was food that was left over. In the logistics job, the work statistics are so harsh that there is no time for toilet breaks and the temperature is so high that he sweats continuously. The hours are punishingly long. The courier job has expectations of customer service while at the same time offering such a pittance that compliance with any customer request puts him out of pocket. Companies take advantage of a three-day unpaid trial period, sometimes there is medical insurance and sometimes not, and employers take any opportunity to ‘stiff’ their workers. Amongst his co-workers he witnesses theft and dishonesty, but says nothing because he has to work alongside them. As he says:

The moral of the this story: When disgruntled, the lowly among us only have each other to pick on, because going after the powerful will only cost us in the end. (p. 202)

I see that the author was born in 1979, in the wake of the Cultural Revolution and at the start of Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms that took China from a command economy to a market economy. He mentions a sister only once, but he does speak quite a bit about his parents. I found myself wondering how parents from such a starkly different type of economy would advise and equip their children to work in a new economy, unlike anything they had known (much like us as parents and grandparents parenting children who will work in an AI economy that is foreign to us).

My parents had only ever taught me to be kind to others. They failed to mention I also had to stick up for my own interests…Maybe because nobody had ever sat me known to talk it through before. My parents wouldn’t go near the topic. They had spent their whole lives in the same work units; the market economy was completely alien to them. …The thing was, my family was from out of town and had no relatives that lived nearby. My parents are unsociable folk, too. (p. 198)… I was starting to feel like my parents were to blame for all the rotten luck I had with people and work. They should have warned me. Their lessons on how to act had zero grounding in this world. They had said nothing about going after what I wanted, only that I should be frugal. What they told me was the wrong way to behave was exactly how everybody was behaving, and society wasn’t punishing them for it but rewarding the, and not just rewarding them, punishing me (p. 222)

Nonetheless, he did have his parents as a fall-back. Burnt out by the culture of exploitation and competitiveness, intimidated by the effort of having to interact with other people and yearning to have time to read and write, he returns to his parents’ home and in his own words, stays indoors for almost two years (p. 264). He later borrows money from them to set up one of his ultimately unsuccessful businesses. He does have a couple of girlfriends: indeed, it is because he wants to be with one of his girlfriends that he shifts from Guandong Province in 2018 to Beijing. He breaks up with another girlfriend when he is living and working in the store in Nanning, and she shifts overseas. He does not have friends, beyond his workmates and at work he is just as likely to make enemies as friends. I found myself wondering if his flight back to his parents’ home was an early example of tang ping, or lying flat culture, a rejection of societal pressure to over-work, a phenomenon in China particularly after COVID.

The structure of the book is unusual and rather hard to follow with a rather strange arrangement of chapters. The book sprang from a blog post written in 2020 (Chapter 2?) so perhaps that might explain why it is structured as it is. His story starts off in 2017 while he is working in Foshan as a package handler, but the chapter is written when he has been in Beijing for three years. The second chapter focuses on his time as a delivery worker in Beijing, followed his work in a convenience store, then in a neighbouring bike shop in Shanghai in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 is headed ‘Other Jobs I’ve Had’ where he lists jobs 1-8 (1: waiter 2: clothing store assistant 3: gas station attendant 4: fast food chain delivery 5: popsicle wholesaler 6: 3D architectural renderings 7: comic book artist 8: graphic designer for a startup magazine about anime). Jobs 9-11 were:

  • 9: copy shop attendant
  • 10: return to the anime magazine
  • 11: his own clothing store. He then has a lengthy section about writing and reading, complete with extracts from two pieces of his writing. He then continues with the job countdown-
  • 12: (2011) online store
  • 13: property management at a mall
  • 14: bakery shop
  • 15: deli stall
  • 16: selling rear view car cameras and car fresheners
  • 17: the logistics job described in Chapter 1 with D company
  • 18: parcel delivery with S Company
  • 19: parcel delivery with Pinjun Express, both described in Chapter 2.

In the closing pages of the book, as he loses his job with Pingun Express, he observes that he had alternated between two mutually exclusive states: working and writing. He tended to do either one or the other, spending half of his life free of work, and the other half consumed by it (p. 317). He considers the nature of “freedom”, which he considers a matter of consciousness, rather than of what you possess. He observes:

So, by freedom, I suppose I am referring to a personal pursuit of sorts, and self-realization through consciousness of our individual selves- the spiritual essence that differentiates one person from another. If more of us when after this kind of freedom, the world would be a more diverse, more inclusive, more equal and richer place. It would be all the more colorful. The pursuit of freedom is what shapes our individual trajectories, our personal goals, and stops us from having to vie for space on a single narrow path…Maybe it is something we can strive for but never quite attain, and maybe I will never reach it in my whole life, but that doesn’t matter. Because the pursuit is more precious than the attainment, and this holds true for every person and for the world as a whole- like our ideals and our convictions, it is the fulcrum of our lives, not their content (p. 315)

Is this valourization of freedom the appeal of the book to a Chinese audience, I wonder? I can’t even think of the word ‘freedom’ without hearing it come out of George W. Bush’s mouth, and it seems almost antithetical to the choreographed military displays in Tienanmen Square. Is the book’s popularity a somewhat subversive embrace of that? Or was the book a bestseller in China when the recipients of packages ordered online became curious about the lives of the people who delivered them to them? Or is the book popular with the tang ping generation, with him forging the way? At times the book reminded me of George Orwell’s Down and Out in London and Paris but this is no dilettante’s or journalist’s curiosity. The jobs came first and the writing emerged later, and it seems that the author is still oscillating between the two, without the choice to leave it all behind as Orwell did.

Most of all, it made me realize how little I know about China.

My rating: 7/10

Sourced from: Yarra Plenty Regional Library

Read because: I had read an article in the Guardian about it.

‘I Eat the Stars’ by Sarah Wilson

2026,283p. & notes

I can’t think of a book that I have read recently that has annoyed me yet affirmed me in equal measure as much as this book did. I still haven’t worked out which response is stronger.

Near the end of the book Wilson sums up her argument in a nutshell:

Facing collapse…allows us to finally get around to exploring the beautiful questions we ache to answer within ourselves. It very literally forces us to confront what matters most. What matters when we ‘lose it all’… Climate collapse has gotten us to confront truth in a fully adult way. The AI threat has us reckoning with what actually makes us us. I feel now that it is all steering us- with considerable urgency and force- to live simpler, more connected lives. To rise into a fuller, more mature, evolved expression of ourselves- as many other tumultuous, liminal, revolutionary times in history have tended to do (p. 253-4)

Even looking at this quote evokes both the things I really disliked and things I embraced in this book.

Let’s start with the ‘dislikes’ first, so that I can end on a more uplifting note.

Sarah Wilson is an Australian author and journalist who wrote I Quit Sugar, a book about anxiety First, We Make the Beast Beautiful and a book about forging a radically hopeful life forward This One Wild and Precious Life. For once, the library’s category sticker of ‘Wellbeing’ is spot-on, and I loathe wellbeing books. Warning sign number one.

This book emerged out of her Wild with Sarah Wilson podcasts, where I gather she interviews interesting people and collapsologists (who knew there was such a field) and has created her own community of podcast and Substack listeners and commentators. I am a podcast listener myself – and may indeed subscribe to her podcast feed because she does have interesting people- but the narrative tone of this book doesn’t rise above the gushing, please-like-me tone of a podcast (much as the tone of this review would be inappropriate for the Australian Book Review). Warning sign number two

She uses ‘overwhelm’ as a noun. Often. The whole book very much about her. Here she is, talking about what she is doing in order to remain faithful: meditate, dance, maximize her menstrual cycle, cry, hurt, cry more, move out of the house when she is frozen in fear, hyperventilate with nervous energy. (p.277). All part of the wellbeing trope that I dislike so much. Warning sign number three.

Moreover, much of the book is a pastiche of other people’s writing. Of course, all academics and writers draw on the work of other people. But this is more than footnoting: she describes this as ‘soul nerding’:

the practice, or art, of absorbing the considered reflections of smart, deep minds who have wrangled as we do now (p. 157)

But when does this move from drawing on knowledge and wisdom to becoming little more than a commonplace book? Even the layout of the book, with sections rarely longer than 2 pages and sometimes as short as a paragraph, separated by an asterisk, suggests a lighting upon one thought, then another, then another. Warning sign number four.

Enough griping. What did I like about the book?

I accept and agree with her perception of the world as rushing towards collapse. It terrifies me. I had to pull myself up at one stage and think “Hold on. I’m a historian. I know about this stuff”. It pushed me into thinking about Cambodia after Pol Pot; I thought back to Barbara Tuchman’s A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th century; my area is 19th century Australian colonial history which saw the collapse of societies that went back millenia and millenia and millenia; I’ve been listening to podcasts about the Roman Empire for years. Humans do survive. Not all of them- indeed, a minority of them. Things do not ‘go back to normal’ but they do not stop either. Some things remain – the most important things – and they are woven into something completely different. Not without pain and sorrow – so much pain and sorrow- but they go on.

She talks about her own shift from being a climate change activist and trying to stop climate collapse, to instead giving up on hoping for better to contemplate that collapse and what it means for us. She discusses ‘prepping’ but eschews it because she asks the question- if I have prepped and others haven’t, what sort of person will that make me?

I’ve been thinking a lot recently about AI and humanity. So has she- along with many others.

…now the tech threat we face is forcing us to define ourselves away from the very AI that we efforted into being. This threat necessarily gets us asking, where does humanity end and artificial intelligence start? If AI can take our jobs and solve our technical and existential problems, if it can take the place of bones-and-beating-hearts lovers and replicate our most intimate art, what is left? What will AI never be able to take? Which is to ask: what is it that makes us human and what makes a human life worthwhile? We might have been avoiding the answer for some time, but can’t any longer (p. 117)

She is aware of herself (probably an offshoot of the self-absorption that I so disliked). She talks about ‘uncertainty intolerance’ and the encouragement in our culture to grasping for certitude, especially through 3-step You Tube videos and bedside self-help manuals. She reminds herself to watch herself over this tendency:

I’ve developed seductive techniques over decades of being a journalist, a story-teller and a self-anointed defender of things. I can often convince others- and myself- of whatever I set my mind to because I have the language to do so; I’ve mastered the certitude game (p. 147)

She notes a recent Brookings analysis that almost 2/3 of climate activists in the United States are women with an average age of fifty-two. She is fifty-two. I am fifty-two plus 18 years. One of my frequent declamations while watching the world news, as I see business meetings, tech bros, and the rapid disappearance of women on the world stage “All those bloody MEN!”. She makes a place for “a mature, feminised style of wisdom and leadership that all men and women can lean into and benefit from” (p. 242).

She is not afraid of spirituality. This is something I grapple with, and something that I am trying to integrate into myself through my involvement with Unitarian Universalism. How many other people, I wonder, sat with the census form, feeling that ‘No Religion’ wasn’t quite right, and yet not knowing how to define what you are? (thank heavens for the fill-in box).

She calls for us to create ‘islands of sanity’, a concept that she takes from Meg Wheatley:

…intentional spaces, conversations, even ways of being in which calm, considered, accepting, forgiving responses and approaches are lived out. These islands are not places where we fix the whole system. They are where we preserve human values, sanity and coherence in small communities in advance of the chaos ahead. They exist as a gentle invitation for anyone who chooses to lift that scab of denial and finds themselves tumbling into that lonely, frightening realm most of you reading this are in (p. 139).

I guess that’s what I’m trying to do in my own life: draw on the wisdom of other people, learn from history, create and build an island of sanity.

I do wonder where she goes after this book. I don’t think there’s any going back to writing books about sugar. Is she going to ramp it up even further or will she just repeat herself in book after book?

Rating: So, reduced to the algorithmic demand of Goodreads, or my own imperfect rating scale- what would I give this book? 9.5/10 for making me think? 5/10 for the narrative voice and self-absorption of it all? I’ll probably settle on 3/5 for Goodreads (because they rank in five stars).

Sourced from: Yarra Plenty Regional Library

Read because: I liked the title (which comes from a poem: Sometimes as an antidote/to fear of death/ I eat the stars.) Also, my Unitarian fellowship is going to discuss it in September.

I hear with my little ear: 1-7 September 2026

Journey Through Time David Olusoga and Sarah Churchwell continue their analysis of Reality TV. In Episode 37 From the Kardashians to Donald Trump they return to Big Brother, which changed the paradigm by bringing in the audience. Filmed over 9 weeks, 24/7 this program used surveillance as entertainment, and changed the business model for Reality TV because the infrastructure that supported the format became a money-making venture in its own right. For example, in Big Brother there was an automated telephone line for voting people out (and note that it is voting them OUT on the basis of dislike, not IN) that used premium rates, and the phone line itself- owned by the production company- became very financially lucrative. There was ongoing pressure on the Reality TV producers to innovate by crossing boundaries e.g. encouraging women to have cosmetic surgery on ‘The Swan’ or meddling with people’s family history in ‘Who’s Your Daddy?’ Survivor was the next breakthrough. We’ve ended up in the situation where so-called ‘Reality’ TV is not real. Being a Reality TV celebrity is now a profession, and ‘celebrities’ are able to recycle through the spin-off shows. That then leads Olusoga and Churchwell to Donald Trump, and neither of them is a fan. When they were casting for ‘The Apprentice’, the producers considered Warren Buffett, Richard Branson and General Electric’s Jack Welch but in the end they settled for Trump, who was at that time bankrupt. Ironically Trump supporters still say that he was a successful business man but he wasn’t then. He was involved for 14 seasons and he has brought to his presidency the mindset of Reality TV. For example, when he was belittling Zelensky in the Oval Office (I can remember listening to the audio of that meeting with my mouth quite literally open- I couldn’t believe what I was hearing!) he actually said “This will be great TV”. Among the many other dubious ‘benefits’ AI can bring us will be algorithmically edited Reality TV which will edit the huge tranche of footage collected by a program for the type of Reality TV you prefer.

The Book Club Episode 26: Mafia and Mystery: is My Brilliant Friend the Greatest Novel of the Century? Apparently The New York Times writers poll placed My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante atop their list– number 1– amongst the 100 best books of the 21st century. Neither Dominic nor Tabby would go that far, but they did enjoy it. I read the whole quartet some time ago (see my review here) and I had forgotten that the first book started with the frame story of Elena in 2010 when Lina has disappeared. They pointed out the use of dialect in the novel, as distinct from standard Italian (something that probably doesn’t come through in a translation very well) and they emphasized the use of doubling in the book, right through to the Elena/Lenu and Lila/Lina names. The two girls do not have a fixed identity and they mimic each other even while they are rivals. Tabby notes that it is as if they are climbing a ladder together, with who is ‘in front’ changing constantly. Dominic gave it 8/10 (which is higher than I thought he would) and Tabby gave it 9/10 on the strength of its ability to show the complexity of female friendship. And as for me, well, it’s encouraged me to go back and watch the series again while it’s still available on SBS.

Tocqueville Road Trip Episode 3: Boundless continent. Reader, I subscribed to the Economist podcasts. As a result, I was able to hear Episode 3 where the presenter John Prideaux follows de Toqueville along the Erie Canal into Michigan, which in de Tocqueville’s time was the frontier. De Tocqueville wondered whether the frontier spirit would spoil the beauty of the environment. In 2026 Pridaux ends up in the township of Saline, where plans were afoot to build a huge data centre as part of Trump’s Stargate project, which will invest $500bn in AI. There he met with Kathryn Haushalter, who was trying to stop the construction of the data centre, but was on a hiding to nothing because excavation had already started and there was no way to stop it. Despite the ‘township’ being the smallest unit of democracy, it cannot obstruct government – nor did de Tocqueville think it should be able to obstruct it. Pridaux has some sympathy for Haushalter’s fight, but in the end sees data centres as just the latest manifestation of the restless energy of America (being an Economist podcast, I think they would say that). Eventually de Tocqueville and Pridaux both end up at Niagara Falls, where Pridaux observes that yes, the frontier spirit did spoil the beauty of the environment, although if you get past the commercial businesses, you can still feel the power of the falls.

‘The Heart’s Invisible Furies’ by John Boyne

2017, 701 p.

SPOILERS

It sometimes occurs that I read a series of books that seem to speak to each other. If I were choosing my books through a chatbot, then I would assume that the sequence was driven by an algorithm. But my last two books were chosen because (a) A Visit from the Goon Squad was an Ivanhoe Reading Circle selection and (b) You Must Remember This was shortlisted for the Miles Franklin and I was interested to read the shortlist. Then The Heart’s Invisible Furies finally became available after literally months on hold at the library -reserved for a reason I can no longer remember- so it must be coincidence rather than an algorithm that has brought me three books in a row that ‘speak’ to each other.

It’s uncanny, though, that all three books look at a life or lives over a span of time, complete with the sliding-doors moment when things could have worked out differently. However, The Heart’s Invisible Furies, unlike the other two books, does not play around with sequencing and plotlines to show off (as in the case of Egan’s book) or to demonstrate a memory in decline (as in You Must Remember This). It’s a relief to read a book that starts at the beginning and just goes through to the end, without any narrative pyrotechnics.

The book in in three long parts, each with several chapters arranged chronologically. It opens in 1945 with the narrator’s sixteen year old mother Catherine Goggin being expelled from the Catholic church on account of her pregnancy. Her own family shuns her and she makes her way to Dublin, living with Sean and his lover Jack Smoot in a small flat as she manages to obtain a position in the tearoom at the Daíl Eireann , the Irish Parliament. Chapter II takes us to 1952 when our narrator Cyril is adopted by Charles and Maude Avery, a childless couple who, while feeding, housing and educating him, never let him forget that he’s ‘not a real Avery’. Cyril does not know his birth parents, and he has no interest in finding them. Charles is serially unfaithful to his wife and shady in his business dealings, while Maude writes books that she hopes no-one will read because it is ‘vulgar’ to be popular. As a seven year old boy, Cyril meets Julian Woodbead when his father Max is acting as Charles’ solicitor, and he falls in love with him instantly. Chapter III is set in 1959 when Julian and Cyril meet again at school and share a room. By 1966 in Chapter IV Cyril has finished school and is working at the Department of Education in the Daíl Eireann building where his unrecognized birth mother works. Meanwhile Julian is travelling through Europe with one of his many girlfriends while the unwilling Cyril becomes a reluctant but celibate boyfriend to one of his co-workers Mary-Margaret Muffet. (Boyne does have fun with his names). By 1973 in Chapter V we find Cyril engaged to Julian’s sister Alice, who had previously been jilted at the altar, and on his wedding day he finally admits to Julian his attraction to him. Julian is furious; the wedding goes ahead, but Cyril flees.

Part II ‘Exile’ opens in 1980 in Amsterdam, where Cyril fled after the wedding fiasco. He has found love with Bastiaan, a trainee doctor and he is working at the Ann Frank House. They socialize at MacIntyre’s pub, owned by Jack Smoot who, unknown to Cyril, had shared lodgings with Cyril’s mother. Together Cyril and Bastiaan take over the care of Ignac, a Slovenian rentboy they find on the street who has been pimped by his father. Again, Cyril needs to flee, ending up with Bastiaan and Ignac in New York in 1987 where Bastiaan is working as a physician dealing with AIDS patients. Here he encounters Julian again, and promises to pass a message back to his erst-while bride and Julian’s sister Alice. Before this happens, tragedy strikes.

In Part III by 1994 Cyril has returned to Ireland alone.Ignac has become a very popular children’s author and his adoptive father, Cyril, is in jail again for tax avoidance. His adoptive mother Maude has died of lung cancer and, although she would have hated the thought, her works have become highly lauded and she is a towering, if deceased, figure in the Irish literary scheme. He keeps his promise to tell Alice about Julian’s death, and becomes drawn into Alice’s family with her new partner, also called Cyril, and Alice’s son Liam. In 2001 he accompanies Ignac on a book tour to Slovenia and has become even more ensconced within Alice’s new family. By 2008 he is approaching death, having experienced both loss and discovery.

The book reminded me of Douglas Stewart’s Shuggie Bain and John of John but with the sprawling riotousness of a John Irving book (to whom the book is dedicated) mixed with Charles Dickens. I laughed out loud several times and I wondered just how long Boyne could sustain the tension of Cyril’s final admission of his homosexuality, and the discovery of his birth mother. Quite a while, as it turned out, but the missed opportunities only heightened the tension. He captures very well the censoriousness of Irish society, underpinned by the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church.

Having enjoyed the ride so far, I was disappointed in the ending which lapsed into sentimentality and excessive tidiness. My disillusionment with the ending was further heightened by the Author’s Note on The Heart’s Invisible Furies which started as a ‘how I came to write this book’ but descended into a spiteful denunciation of his failed relationships. I should have stopped reading a chapter before the end.

But until then, I really enjoyed a story told chronologically, with a flawed but ultimately likeable narrator. I hadn’t realized that John Boyne was the author of The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, which despite its best-seller status has attracted much criticism. Boyne himself has had his own battles within the culture wars. I’m not going to let that spoil my enjoyment of the book: I could barely put it down, and the disappointment I had with the ending came from the book itself, and not the controversy surrounding its author.

My rating: – how to rate it? If I’d stopped before the last chapter it would have been a 9.5 but given that I didn’t, perhaps 8?

Sourced from: Yarra Plenty Regional Library

Read because: I think I must have read a very positive review of it somewhere. I have had it on reserve since last year, so an 8 month wait!

‘A Visit from the Goon Squad’ by Jennifer Egan

2010 (2011) 349 p.

I had heard a lot about this book, and it hadn’t registered with me that it was written in 2010, which in these days of deluge of new titles is an eon ago. I don’t know why I didn’t read it at the time- it must not have appealed to me- and I’m not sure that it appeals to me now, sixteen years later. The title evoked a mafia, true-crime book, and the blurbs crowed with praise without actually denoting what the book was. I’m not sure that I even know what the book is, either.

The book starts with the two characters who are the linchpins of the book. The first is Sasha, personal assistant to a record producer who ‘picks up’ two things in the first chapter: a younger man called Alex whom she takes home for sex, and a wallet stolen from the handbag of another woman while she was in the toilet. The second is Bennie Salazar, Sasha’s former employer, who founded Sow’s Ear records and is still immersed in the music of the 1970s. These two characters are the linchpin, but only because the other characters have or have had a tangential relationship with them in the forty-odd years covered by this book. It’s like a book of six-degrees-of-separation, or a form of narrative doodling, where the author creates a character and then plays with them. The thirteen chapters each have a different character as their focus, slipping backwards and forwards in time, occasionally voiced in the first person, or in the format of a Powerpoint presentation. There are a lot of characters, and as you’re reading you’re not quite sure whether you’ve met them before. There are two musicians, washed up by the 1990s: Scotty, a semi-derelict who goes back to Bennie the record producer and launches a last open-air concert, hyped by influencers, and Bosco, a member of the Conduits, the bank that launched Bennie’s career who wants to commit suicide on stage but ends up recovering from cancer. There’s Dolly the publicist who holds a disastrous party and ends up in jail for negligence, who becomes a publicist for a dictator. There’s Rob, Sasha’s ‘pretend boyfriend’ at college, who dies in a drug-fuelled swim in the East River. There’s Lou, the hedonistic record producer, thrice married and the father of six children.

The ‘goon squad’ of the title is not a bunch of mafia thugs, as I suspected, but instead is time. ‘Time’s a goon, right? You gonna let that goon push you around?’ Two of the characters- Scotty and Bosco- both question how they started off at one place and ended up at another. When Scotty, disheveled and disturbed turns up in Bennie’s plush office he says

…I came for this reason: I want to know what happened between A and B…A is when we were both in the band, chasing the same girl. B is now. (p. 107)

Bosco wants to produce a new record ‘A to B’

The album’s called A to B, right? And that’s the question I want to hit straight on: How did I go from being a rock star to being a fat fuck no one cares about? Let’s not pretend it didn’t happen…Time’s a goon, right? Isn’t that the expression? (p. 134)

This question lies at the heart of the book- and indeed, in the heart of anyone over the age of, say, fifty who can look back at their life and wonder how they got there. What are the hinge-points; what are the inevitabilities? What if…what if.. It’s a big question but I don’t know if this multi-layered, tangled story is the best way to address it. There is a discipline to the book, and an overarching structure, but you have to work very hard to find it.

This book was discussed at the recent Ivanhoe Reading Circle meeting (which I missed) and both the presenter there, and several blogs I’ve read (including Louise at A Strong Belief in Wicker) felt that the book definitely deserved a second reading. Indeed some people have spent an inordinate amount of time reconstructing the timelines of the characters of the stories. I can see, just by flipping through the first chapter, that a second reading would yield a tapestry of threads that I hadn’t noticed on the first reading. But for me, a first reading should bring its own rewards, rather than needing a second reading to make it intelligible. As it is, each chapter is self-contained, and reads almost as a short story in its own right (indeed, several were published in the New Yorker as stand-alones). In a world drowning in new publications, I don’t know if any author has the right to demand two readings of any book to make it coherent: a second reading should be a joyful choice, not a post-requisite.

My rating: 7/10

Sourced from: purchased second hand from Brotherhood Books

Read because: Ivanhoe Reading Circle August 2026 selection.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 24-31 August 2026

Festival of Dangerous Ideas. This festival was held in Sydney between 20-30 August this year. I usually report on my podcast listening, but I listened to Richard Flanagan’s address on ‘Heresies’ which is on YouTube instead. On his substack, Derek Thompson says that Everything is Television today, and the slippage between podcasts and You Tube is ubiquitous. There’s not much to see here except a man talking, so you may as well just listen to it. However you access it, here is a link to Richard Flanagan’s excellent lecture on the power of the Israeli lobby. Good on you.

Global Roaming And while I was at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas(metaphorically), I then listened to Nobel Prize winner and editor of Rappler Maria Ressa talking with Hamish Macdonald on How Big Tech is creating the next Donald Trump. She shares some amazing statistics: 74% of the world’s population now lives under some form of dictatorship, and in July 51% of internet traffic was not human. Of the ‘open internet’ only 25% remains open and not behind a paywall. And as far as people saying “I get my news from the internet”, of every hour of internet viewing, only 15 minutes takes you to an actual news website. She lays out an “authoritarian stack”: Peter Thiel bankrolling Donald Trump and JD Vance, Palantir winning a US $10 billion military contract, and Silicon Valley firms wiring themselves into state power. [I’m starting to be really uneasy about JD Vance]. As with the rest of the world, Australia is prostrating itself in front of Big Tech in order to get data centres, but do they provide sovereignty? [not if we’re just becoming a data processing factory for Big Tech say I].And should the ABC allow Anthropic to scrape its archives in order to make AI more Australian?- the ultimate Faustian bargain. [No bloody way, say I]

The War Game Series 1 The Grey Zone Episode 6 Iran- the hidden hand. This series was recorded in 2021, and up until then Iran had mainly used proxy forces as a form of warfare against countries like Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United States. In 2018 Trump tore up the nuclear agreement with Iran, preferring instead ‘maximum pressure’. During 2019 oil tankers were blown up in the Straits of Hormuz, probably by Iran, and there was skirmishing and seizures of tankers. [Did Trump learn nothing? Obviously] On 3 January 2020, the United States killed Iran’s top spy master, Major General Qasem Soleimani, in a drone strike in Iraq, thus undertaking similar Grey Zone tactics to what Iran was using.

The Rest is History The Fascist World Cup: Mussolini’s Football Dictatorship This episode was actually from their Extras series for Rest of History Club members. Sport was part of Mussolini’s projection of a New Italy. He built new gyms and sporting fields, and mass sporting events took over the existing Church and Communist sporting clubs. At the 1932 Olympics the Italian team wore black shirts, and gained international prestige for their performance in boxing, cycling and soccer (how lovely to hear the Irish guest historian Paul Rouse refer to it as ‘soccer’ instead of ‘football’! Just as Australia has its own football, so does Ireland). The Italian soccer team started headhunting players from South America, on the basis of their Italian heritage, which wasn’t common at that time.. In 1934 the second World Cup was held in Italy, and it was seen by Mussolini as a showcase for fascism. There was press propaganda, the opening of new stadia and the offering of tourist packages. Not many Italians saw the games, but they did hear them on the radio, where the broadcasts were in Italian, rather than in English. A game against Austria was won by Italy, although there are questions about the refereeing and certainly there were South American players on the team, but there was probably no conspiracy. They then won against the Czech team in the final. The Italian team then went on to win the Gold Medal in the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, then the 1938 French World Cup. By this time, the soccer team had completely different players, which is testament to the depth of the Italian talent.

‘Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About it’ by Cory Doctorow

2025, 334 p.

How wonderful to invent a term, and then find out that it has been declared Word of the Year, as the Macquarie Dictionary did in 2024. ‘Enshittification’ captures perfectly our frustration and impotence when huge multinational create and change their own rules, deliberately degrading their products and holding us hostage to price-hikes, leaving us to rue that we had ever been drawn in by what seemed to hold such promise.

Enshittification has four stages:

  1. First, platforms are good to their users
  2. Then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers
  3. Next, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves
  4. Finally, they have become a great pile of shit (p. 10)

His main targets are Facebook, Amazon, IPhone (Apple), Twitter and Google. He addresses the first four as these as separate case studies, but for all of them the process of enshittification is the same. But it’s not just these four companies: in effect, anything that is ‘smart’ holds you hostage to the manufacturer, even though you have purchased it. So we see a SNOO Smark Sleeper ‘smart’ basinette that rocks a baby to sleep suddenly demanding $20 per month for them NOT to disable the features, if you should dare to use it for a second child, or sell it to someone else. We see ‘smart’ cars requiring mechanics who have the capabilities to repair them to apply (and you to pay) for a code to override the engine being disabled. Even artificial eyes, grafted onto patients’ eyes, can be ‘bricked’ by the company should it fall into difficulties. If “there’s an app for that” then use of the app propels you into a different legal realm where the design of the app pre-empts all other claims to intellectual property of the content.

The constant screwing of competitors, users and customers; the cynical takeover of competitors and quashing of their products; the ongoing adjustment of ‘terms and conditions’ where ongoing participation signifies consent – these companies are appalling. But the cost of leaving, and the withdrawal of face-to-face alternatives by government departments and banks draws us more and more under their control.

The book is not necessarily about AI but he introduces the idea of ‘reverse centaur’ here, which he takes up in more detail in his most recent book The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI. The mythological centaur, you’ll remember, was a man on top with the legs of a horse, or in automation terms, a worker who has some kind of tool that lets them do more than they could do on their own (p. 121). A farmer with a tractor is a centaur, and so too is a cashier using a register that adds up the groceries and tells how much change to give (oh! how I would have loved such a machine when I worked the register at a neighbourhood hardware store!) [On the other hand, I could and still can work out change, which is something that I doubt many cashiers could do today]. But a reverse-centaur is a machine that uses a human to accomplish more than the machine could manage on its own (p.120). In particular he looks at the working conditions of Amazon delivery drivers, as exposed on the documentary The Great Amazon Heist, which you can watch on SBS On Demand.

He picks up on Yanis Varoufakis’ thesis expressed in Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, where technology was transformed after the 2008 GFC from a primarily profit-seeking enterprise to a primarily rent-seeking enterprise (p. 197) Because the tech giants control the ‘factors of production’, they are imposing a form of rent onto the rest of us. Microsoft Office can now only be bought as a subscription, not an outright product that you own; a purchased e-book can be removed from the platform whenever the app decides; a digital subscription to a magazine only gives you access to the archive as long as you keep paying the subscription fee.

The power of these tech companies over politics is daunting. When Doctorow was half-way through the writing of this book Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term where, with Elon Musk, he set about dismantling the legislative restraints that had been placed on some of their power during the Biden era. The legal power they wield is disproportionate too, and often wielded against third parties: a blind person is allowed to break proprietary software to upload it to a text reader, but a sighted person risks huge fines in assisting them to do so. The financial penalty for an author allowing a purchaser to move their purchased audiobook to another platform break DRM software would cover the purchase of thousands of CDs.

After cataloguing this world of woe, Doctorow finishes by outlining the ‘cure’: a noble enterprise, but one which he does not carry off convincingly. He argues that competition, regulation, interoperability and tech worker power are four forces which discipline technology firms. The only competition I can see amongst the tech firms is their race to enshittify everything they touch. Thank heavens for government-owned enterprises like ABC, BBC and to a lesser extent SBS, but they are under huge pressure from tech firms and the media companies that are in a love/hate relationship with them to enshittify their own offerings. Competition regulators all over the world seem to be toothless. Privacy policies are presented as an all-or-nothing ‘agreement’ and I don’t think that it’s in the conspiracy-realm theory to suspect that your phone is listening to you when an email advertising something you discussed suddenly appears in your inbox. When tech-bros parade around with their heavy-framed smart glasses, all privacy is gone. Attempts to force tech companies to pay for news led to Facebook pulling community pages before grudgingly allowing access again- and this fight hasn’t finished. Attempts to limit social media for children (which I always saw as more a way of empowering parents and schools to say ‘no’ than actually outsmarting a tech-savvy adolescent) are being adopted, but always under scrutiny for their ineffectiveness- which lies in the lands of the tech companies anyway. He looks at the successful Silicon Valley tech workers who walked out a Google as a form of power, but he’s looking at dead men (because they are overwhelmingly men) walking. AI will sap any power they might have.

This is an eye-opening book, but I came away feeling enshittified, rather than empowered. I know that his next book The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI takes up the issue of AI, but I fear that his faith in ‘cures’, which are being dismantled and rendered impotent before our very eyes, is not reassuring. But if you want specific examples of enshittification (an index would have been much appreciated) and to feel oppressed and angry, then this is your book.

My rating: 8.5/10

Sourced from: Yarra Plenty Regional Library (at least he’ll get the Lending Rights payment directly, I guess)

Read because: I had heard the hype about the term.

‘The Man Who Stole the Gods’ by Matthew Campbell

2026, 432 p.

When I last visited the National Museum of Cambodia in 2024, there was a special gallery devoted to artefacts that had been returned from overseas museums. Alerted as we are to stolen artefacts by the ABC Program ‘The Things the British Stole’ and Australian’s own disgruntlement at the British Museum’s refusal to return the Gweagal Shield, I was interested to see the celebration of the return of Cambodia heritage objects. But having read this book, I will take even more interest next time because right there, in the middle of the picture is the statue of the Hindu God Shiva and his son Skanda (rendered as a little boy standing before Shiva) which is one of the cultural artefacts specially named in this book.

The ‘man who stole the Gods’ was British expatriate and Bangkok resident Douglas Latchford, who was first entranced by Cambodian artworks in the 1950s. By the 1970s, having become very wealthy as manager of an ‘agency’ bringing consumer goods to Thailand he was in a position to indulge his passion for Cambodian artefacts, following the example of an American spy Jim Thompson, who was a major collector. He channelled much of his stolen bounty to the Metropolitan Museum of Art through Thomas Hoving, its 36 year old director who was ambitious to bolster the Met’s collection during the boom years following WW2. His successor was Martin Lerner, who was appointed chief curator of Indian and Southeast Asian art at the Met. For the Met collectors, Douglas Latchford was their man.

Latchford had two passions. One of them was young Thai bodybuilders, and after a failed sham marriage to a Thai women which yielded a daughter, Julia, he was free to surround himself with powerfully built young men. His other passion was ancient Cambodian stone.

Latchford had an encyclopedic knowledge of Khmer civilization, attained through study, travel and incessant collection. He was generally dismissive of art historians and academics. He became a trusted partner to Spink & Son in London, Britain’s premier source for Asian antiquities, and developed a near-monopoly on the artefacts that he sent to UK. However, the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property meant that the artefacts he was sending had to have a minimally plausible origin story. He established a relationship with scholar Emma Bunker, who despite few publications to her name and no PhD, had sufficient academic reputation to convince buyers that their intended purchases would not fall foul of the 1970 UNESCO convention. She managed to obtain letterheads from legitimate dealers who had operated prior to the 1970 cutoff and had a signed letter from a prominent now-deceased Spink executive so that she could generate the paperwork to attest that the artworks had secure provenance. He also could draw on the reputation of Nancy Wiener, a prominent New York art dealer with a gallery on East 74th Street.

Meanwhile, suspicions were arising about Latchford’s activities, both in Cambodia and the United States. In US Special Agent Brendon Easter from the Department of Homeland Security (huh- perhaps they do act well sometimes) and Alexander Wilson, a prosecutor at the Southern District of New York court investigated the proposed sale by Sotherby’s Auctions of the Duryodhana, an important artefact excavated from Koh Ker. In Cambodia, archaeologist Bourdonneau excavated ruins and found pedestals where statues had been removed. Bradley Gordon, an attorney in Phnom Penh, led a team of young Cambodian lawyers acting from the Cambodian side.

Most importantly for the investigation, they found Toek Tik, who had been one of the men who had excavated the artefacts over many years. Living first under the Khmer Rouge, and then through the civil war which followed the Vietnamese invasion to topple Pol Pot, he was now old and sick and remorseful that he had ever been involved in the theft of Cambodia’s gods. Although unable to read and write, he had a good memory for what was located where, and he was able to lead investigators to the sites where the pedestals and remnants stood, making it possible to link the exported artefacts and the location.

But as the net closed in, it was never certain that the artefacts would actually be surrendered, even though it could be proved that they had been looted after the 1970 Convention (indeed, right up to the 1990s). One heavy purchaser from Latchford was Jim Clark, a computer-technology millionaire who had made his money through Netscape (remember Netscape?), who had spent $35 million on 30 pieces between 2003-2007 via Latchford, on the say-so of forged documentation. Julia Latchford, Latchford’s daughter and heir, found that her financial movements were circumscribed by the legal scrutiny under which Latchford’s affairs had been placed, and in 2021 she signed an agreement with the Cambodian government to return all of his Khmer works. Investigators found themselves poring over architectural magazines that featured luxury homes, in order to focus their search for particular objects.

Works from the Clark and Latchford collections found their way back to Cambodia, but most disturbing for me was the intransigence of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. While I note that two more pieces were returned on June 10 2026 to join the fourteen others returned in 2023 that I saw while in Phnom Penh, it wasn’t certain that the Met would relinquish custodianship.

The book’s focus is the stolen artefacts, but along the way it gives a good history of Cambodia generally for people who are not familiar with it. Matthew Campbell puts his journalistic skills to good use, combining his investigative work in tracking the networks across multiple continents, with a succinct telling of Cambodian history. I’ve been working on improving my knowledge of this history, but I admit that I hadn’t realized the length or tragedy of the civil war following Pol Pot’s overthrow. There is nothing good that can be said about the Khmer Rouge, but they did not intentionally damage the temples, and much of the looting that took place occurred during the civil war period when the whole society was in turmoil. That wealthy museums like the Met should take advantage of this societal breakdown, and so recently, is shameful.

It is right that these gods should be back in Cambodia where they belong. They have outlasted collectors, connoisseurs, museum curators, gallery owners, and the impoverished men who were drawn by the (meagre) money they were offered to dig up their own heritage. And that’s just the way it should be:

The artworks that had determined the course of Latchford’s life were as eternal as anything crafted by human hands. When he discovered them, they had already survived for a millennium or longer, silent witnesses to the rise and fall of kings, the arrival and retreat of new religions, and, ultimately, the ravaging of the nation that had created them, in the service of an ideology that would have been incomprehensible to their makers. To obtain them and hold on to them, to hoard them and profit from them, Latchford had stolen, lied, and cheated, ruining relationships and breaking laws. But even this intense connection was transient. Immortality was the preserve of gods in stone and bronze. (Ch. 28)

My rating: 8.5/10

Sourced from: purchased e-book (hence the absence of page numbers in my quotations)

Read because: my son in Phnom Penh recommended it. There’s a two-part ABC podcast about it called Kidnapping the Gods

Six degrees of separation: From ‘Always Home Always Homesick’ to….

The First Saturday of the month is Six Degrees Day. This meme, hosted by Kate at Books Are My Favourite and Best involves her choosing a starting book, then you linking the titles or themes of six other books. But this month was a little different because instead of Kate choosing the book, you were invited to start with your bookgroup’s current read. I attend two book groups: the first group with about 7 of us now called ‘Rosanna Readers’ was in the past a CAE bookgroup, and the second is the Ivanhoe Reading Circle, a more formal, meeting based group that was established in 1920. During September, the Reading Circle read Hannah Kent’s Always Home Always Homesick.

This book is a memoir of Kent’s sojourn in Iceland as a 17 year old on a Rotary exchange visit, her love for Iceland and its inspiration for her first book Burial Rites which was published to great acclaim after a spirited bidding war for publishing rights.

  1. It would come as no surprise that I chose Burial Rites as the first link. As probably everyone knows, the book is a ‘speculative biography’ of Agnes Magnusdottir, who was executed for murder in Iceland in 1829. Awaiting sentence, she is interned on a remote farm, where enforced proximity draws her into the circle of her keeper’s family. (See my review here)
  2. In writing Burial Rites, Kent looked to Margaret Atwood’s approach to writing Alias Grace, also about a woman charged with murder. Atwood had written “Where mere hints and outright gaps exist in the records, I have felt free to invent”. I read Alias Grace before starting this blog, but there are similarities between the two books both in subject matter and approach.
  3. Always Home, Always Homesick is about the author’s love for Iceland and the continuing pull it exerts upon her. Kent references Haldor Laxness’ Independent People several times, and to be honest, I think that it’s the only book that I have read set in Iceland. I read this 23 years ago, long before this blog and I can’t remember much of it except the bleakness of the sheepfarmer living his stubbornly independent life in a turf hut in the bitter cold.
  4. While we’re in the cold, I just recently read Andrew Miller’s The Land in Winter which is set in a small English village in the winter of 1962-3 when England was plunged into freezing conditions between Boxing Day 1962 until the spring of 1963. It’s a very domestic story of two neighbouring families, set in an exceptional climate event. It was shortlisted for the Booker Prize last year, and I think it would have been a very worthy winner (but it wasn’t). My review is here.
  5. As denoted by the title, much of Hannah Kent’s book Always Home Always Homesick addresses the theme of homesickness. Could any writer have done it better than Colm Toibin with Brooklyn? The film was fantastic- perhaps even better than the book? My review here.
  6. Homesickness going the other way is addressed in Stephanie Bishop’s The Other Side of the World a beautifully nuanced book about nostalgia, motherhood and the sense of ‘home’. Set between 1963 and 1966, English-born Charlotte has been plunged into rapid motherhood, long before she feels ready. Ground down by the sheer mindlessness and fatigue of dealing with babies, she acquiesces in her husband’s dream of emigrating to Australia and ends up in stark, hot, sun-drenched Perth. My review is here.

A very fiction-y Six Degrees for me this time but I’ve managed to move between Australia, Iceland, English, Brooklyn and Ireland.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 16-23 August 2026

Bukele: el señor de Los sueños I’m rather proud of myself for reaching the end of this series, spoken completely in Spanish (although I admit to having to read the Spanish transcript alongside it). I’ve been listening to it for literally months, with a long gap in between. I finally listened to Episode 6 today, where Bukele has stacked the court and congress sufficiently to obtain a consecutive period as president, even though this is explicitly outlawed in the constitution. There is a final Extra episode, where they discuss the way that Bukele has become a role model for other Latin American countries that want to ‘solve’ their problem with gangs. If you can speak Spanish, it’s really worth listening to. You can find all the Spanish episodes here.

The Daily El Nino is Back. And Worse Than Ever There’s a lot of talk about the upcoming El Nino event. This is a very clear episode featuring Chico Harlan, the global climate correspondent for The New York Times. He points out that the El Nino event takes place in a rectangle in the Pacific Ocean that stretches from the South American continent at Peru and across to Hawaii. Temperatures have already gone up .5 degree, and are expected to reach 2degrees- and maybe even 3 degrees- which makes it a mega El Nino. The effect is often seen in the years following the El Nino event (which is called El Nino because Peruvian native people noticed dead fish washing up on their shore in November/Dec and they called it El Nino de la Navidad – the child/son of Christmas). The problem is that we are facing a mega-El Nino at a time when we also have climate change, which is likely to make it more extreme. There is no scientific consensus over separating out El Nino from climate change: they may be affecting each other, or maybe not and we don’t have the records to prove whether El Ninos are becoming stronger. But perhaps 2027 with its mega El Nino will give us a preview of what is coming.

Journey Through Time Episode 36 The Art of Manipulation: The History of Reality TV Episode 2 Here Sarah Churchwell and David Olusoga return to the American Family program from the 1970s that we left in Episode 1. The family featured, the Louds, already had a rocky marriage and the program showed a family undergoing a divorce. Many people began judging them, and as the first Reality TV victims the parents felt that they had to engage with the criticism. However, their gay son Lance was the first Reality TV star. He was already out to his family, but the show put a human face onto a social phenomenon. The BBC produced a similar show in 1974 called The Family, but unlike the American show, they chose a working class family, exposing the family to an open season of judgement. The next iteration of reality TV was a program called Living in the Past which had groups of adults and their children living in an Iron Age village c.200 BCE. They stayed there for 13 months- something that would not be allowed today, especially with children, but the camera was only there one day a week. What changed Reality TV was technological change. Film was expensive, and American Family required a 25 hrs of filming to generate 1 hour of television, and it took one year to edit. Once magnetic tape was invented, it was possible to film 1000 hours cheaply to generate that hour, and it could be computer-edited quickly . In 1992 MTV used this technology to present The Real World, where they brought in a group of young people into a plush apartment in different cities for each of their 33 (!!) seasons. The casting was manipulated to evoke conflict, and there was a ‘confession booth’ where the participants were interviewed. But it wasn’t just the cast that was manipulated: the audience was manipulated as well. It became increasingly gamified, with challenges set and the format was syndicated throughout the world.