Author Archives: residentjudge

‘A Spot of Bother’ by Mark Haddon

2007, 503 p.

I read in succession two books that start off with the sudden death of a middle aged man, and writing this review some time (too long) after reading the book, I find myself getting confused between this book and J. R. Rowling’s The Casual Vacancy (reviewed here). Both are set in England, both have unlikeable characters and treacherous families, and neither shows off the author’s skills to best effect.

George is a 61 year old retiree who would certainly qualify for the Dull Men’s Club. The secret of contentment, he thinks, lies in ignoring many things completely. Things like his wife’s affair with his ex-colleague or the wisdom of his daughter marrying a man who seems to be nearly as dull as George is. But when George discovers a lesion on his hip, he is convinced that it is cancer and spirals off into his own whirlpool of paranoia, planning to kill himself or, literally, to take matters into his own hands. Meanwhile, his wife Jean is recapturing her lost youth with George’s business partner David, an affair that she sees as something romantic and beautiful, but which, when George discovers them having sex, is unattractive and embarrassing between two “old people”. When George and Jean learn that their daughter Kate is going to marry Ray, a tradesman with a strong northern accent, they both disapprove, as does Kate’s gay brother Jamie. Somehow weddings often seem to bring out the worst in families. Jean’s meddling, Jamie’s huffiness over whether his boyfriend Tony should be invited and how he will be received, and tension and uncertainties between Kate and Ray make this whole wedding seem a disaster in waiting. The whole thing teeters into farce, which undermines somewhat the rather acute and poignant observations that Haddon had made along the way.

The story is told from the varying perspectives of the characters, each of them rationalizing their stance, as we all do. What Haddon does well is butt these perspectives up against each other, challenging the veracity of the various points of view. Jean, for instance, sees herself as a vibrant and attractive older woman, where George sees her as a slightly repellent, plump, aging woman with witch-like hair. George sees himself as a slightly ironic, logical older man, where Jean sees him as a rather pathetic, lost retiree looking for relevance. Kate values Ray for how good he is with her young son Jacob; Ray is bemused by how angry Kate is all the time.

This book had none of the endearing charm of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, and it felt as if it could have been written by any number of middle-ranking English authors. The ending was just ridiculous, and I finished the too-lengthy book – and its unlikeable characters- feeling as if I was glad to leave them all behind.

My rating: 6/10

Sourced from: ex- CAE Bookgroups stock

Read because: my ex-CAE Ladies Who Say Oooh Bookgroup chose it from the dregs of the books left over now that CAE has closed.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 16-23 August 2025

The Rest is History Episode 583 The Lion, the Priest and the Parlourmaids: A 1930s Sex Scandal The story of Harold Davidson, the Rector of Stiffkey (sometimes pronounced ‘stuckey’ for some insane English reason) challenges you as a listener to either judge him with the obloquy he deserves, or to take a more ‘charitable’ view of him as a naive man mis-cast into the clerical profession, who had been framed and punished unjustly. He was a Church of England minister who took an intense interest in young girls of easy virtue, and he became known as the ‘Prostitutes’ Padre’. He ended up being defrocked, after the Bishop of Norwich launched proceedings against him for immorality. His courtcase revealed multiple occasions of pestering, but there was only one main witness against him. Always a frustrated stage-performer, he spent the rest of his life as a Blackpool showman trying to raise the money to appeal his case, ending up being mauled by a lion as part of the sideshow. Tom and Dominic become a little silly during this episode, but it does lend itself to farce.

History’s Heroes. I must admit that I’m a bit wary of any podcast that proclaims to deal with ‘heroes’, but I was interested in the story of NZ plastic surgeon Harold Gillies, the subject of Saving Face with Harold Gillies, a two-part episode. Born in New Zealand, he trained and lived in England, and when World War I broke out, he went to the front where he worked on men who had suffered the appalling facial injuries, many of which were sustained when raising their heads above the trenches. World War I changed the nature of war: 300 men in 1914 were equivalent to 60,000 in Napoleon’s time. On the front, he recognized the importance of the work of dentists, who were better at facial reconstruction than doctors were, He pioneered the use of the ‘flap’, where skin from one part of the body was reattached to other parts of the body over a long series of surgeries (although looking at the Wikipedia entry, I don’t know that the results of the flap were much better than the original surgery). In fact, the results are so poor that perhaps Harold Gillies could be considered by the The Human Subject podcast, which looks at some of the barbarities that were carried out in the name of science. After the war, he moved into cosmetic surgery and gender reassignment surgery – indeed he carried out among the first female-male and male-female surgeries. The second episode features interviews with his son and grandson, who query somewhat the heroic status awarded to Harold Gillies, while still maintaining pride in their connection to him.

El Hilo. I’ve been appalled looking at the prison regime introduced to El Salvador by Nayib Bukele, and this 6-part series does a really good dive (if very critical) into Bukele and his policies. I’m listening to it in Spanish, and reading the Spanish transcript. However, it is possible to get an English translation of each episode here. Episode 1: Someone Like Bukule (link is to the English translation) goes to his childhood as the grandson of Palestinian immigrants, and the son of a politically engaged businessman and commentator. His political career started off with a mayoral position in Nuevo Cuscatlán, before moving on to become the mayor of San Salvador. Episode 2 Move Fast and Break Things (Muévete rápido, rompe cosas) (I don’t think there’s an English transcript) follows his career as he becomes the President, breaking the hold of the Left on the presidency by presenting himself as an outsider to the political system (even though he had been involved in mayoral politics). Despite making many populist promises during the campaign, then warns of “bitter medicine” required to solve the economic and social problems of El Salvador.

Global Roaming (ABC) And blow me down if Geraldine and Hamish don’t devote this week’s episode to Nayib Bukele as well. Meet the ‘World’s Coolest Dictator’ features an interview with Vera Bergengruen who is one of the few Western journalists to have interviewed Bukele for a TIME profile. She emphasizes Bukele’s ‘poster child’ status amongst other Latin American countries moving to the right, and his stratospheric popularity, even among families that have a family member incarcerated in his terrible prison system. Good, but it lacks the depth of the El Hilo series (only to be expected as this is a single half-hour episode compared with six one-hour episodes)

Missing in the Amazon (Guardian) Episode 5: The Fightback. In Lula da Silva’s first presidency, there had been a 50% reduction in deforestation. When he returned to the presidency in 2023, it was the closest election result in Brazilian history. After Bolsonaro had given carte blanche to illegal operations in the Amazon, Lula reactivated the special forces to apprehend the mining barges and illegal fishing. However, poverty, the size of the Amazon and organized crime mean that there are low sentences and big money. Pelado was a mid-level commander in an operation conducted by Ruben Villar (there are different versions of his name) AKA ‘Colombia’, a warlord withh strong political connections. Will he ever face court? (update as of 22/7/25- The Federal Court of Amazonas has accepted the prosecutors’ case against ‘Colombia’ ) Episode 6: The Frontline In June 2025 Dom’s book How to Save the Amazon was published. Ironically, despite Lula, it is just as dangerous today and if Dom and Bruno embarked on the same expedition, there would probably be the same result. His friend Betto thinks that Lula has squandered the opportunity to confront organized crime, while others are more optimistic, hoping that Lula wins the next election in 2026.

Off again

Of for a little trip to Vietnam, where I will meet up with Dean, Jesse and the granddaughters. Once again, you can join me at https://landofincreasingsunshine.wordpress.com/

See you on the other side.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 8-15 August 2025

Missing in the Amazon (Guardian) Episode 3: The protector and the poacher looks at Bruno Pereira, the indigenous expert who was killed along with Dom Phillips on the Javari river in western Brazil. Pereira was born in the city, but was recruited to work with the forest people. When he was dismissed from FUNAI (National Indigenous People Foundation) , an indigenous rights foundation, he worked with EVU, established by his colleague Betto (?) and they patrolled the river, destroying the boats of illegal miners and poachers. One of those poachers was Pelado (Amarildo da Costa de Oliveira) who had been part of the settler colonization of indigenous areas that was encouraged by the military dictatorship in the 1960s until they were evicted from Indigenous areas in the 1980s. Seething with resentment, and emboldened by Bolsonaro’s anti-Indigenous policies, Pelado lived in a river-side village, where Dom and Bruno were shot. Episode 4: The Ambush is a first-person account by Dom Phillips’ colleague at the Guardian, Tom Phillips (similar name, no relation) who was one of the people who searched the Javari river for the missing men. From the police interviews with Pelado and his brother Oseney da Costa de Oliveira, we learn that the men were ambushed and shot at Pelado’s village, with their bodies moved several times to hide them from discovery.

Rear Vision (ABC) The Rise of Vladimir Putin Putin has been in power for 25 years and has moulded himself to the times. He came to power promising order after the orgy of corruption by the oligarchs in the wake of the dissolution of the USSR, then when economically things picked up with oil exports etc. he oversaw a prosperous economy. But in the last few years he has been a war president, defining himself as anti-Europe, anti-woke, anti-liberal. He has, however, always been popular, with his approval ratings (to the extent that you could trust them) not dropping below 60%. Although he initially had the support of the anti-oligarch middle class, many people felt that they had been sold a pup with his power-swap with Medvedev, he has maintained authority and popularity. The current situation is a consequence of the end of the Cold War, but instead the West is moving more towards Russian ideas, with the rise of the hard right across the world. The episode features Arkady OstrovskyRussian editor for The Economist magazine, Ivan Nechepurenkojournalist with the Moscow bureau of the New York Times and Joshua Keating, staff writer at Slate magazine.

Witness History St Teresa of Avila’s severed hand Well, when you dig up a body and it hasn’t decomposed, of course you’ll chop off its hand as a relic. Especially if it’s the hand of St Teresa of Avila. Somehow it ended up in a convent in Ronda, where it stayed until General Franco took it and kept it in his bedchamber “looking after it” during the war and then asking to keep it until the end of his reign. The sisters of the convent didn’t get it back until 1976. It was on display in its special case, with rings on the fingers. I visited Ronda back in July 2018 but I didn’t know about this relic: I visited a church there, but obviously the wrong one. In Feb 2024 the four remaining sisters were advertising for other Carmelite nuns to come there because it was in danger of closing – I wonder if it did? It seems to still be going.

‘The Robin Hood Guerillas: The Epic Journey of Uruguay’s Tupamaros’ by Pablo Brum

2014, 402 p.

I’ve been dipping into books about Uruguay- a place I’ve never been- and about Jose (‘Pepe’) Mujica, the ex-President of Uruguay who died recently. I haven’t been able to find many English-language books about the Tupamaros, especially recent ones, and this book, written in 2014, seemed to be as recent as I was going to find. I know little about the historiography of Latin America, and Uruguay in particular, or the author (who was/is an American international security analyst – whatever that is) so I can only take the book on its own terms. To my admittedly untrained eye, the book seemed to be fairly even-handed, and easily read by a newcomer to the area, although an index for the huge range of characters would have been useful.

So the Tupamaros- what a strange name. This Marxist-Leninist urban guerilla group took its name from Tupac Amaru II, the leader of a failed Andean rebellion against the Spanish in Peru, who was executed in 1781. The group, more properly known as Movimiento de Liberación Nacional – Tupamaros, MLN-T formed in the early 1960s, and one of their first acts was to steal weapons and ammunition from the Tiro Suizo, a shooting range in Colonia, Uruguay. The weapons, supplemented by stolen police uniforms, enabled them to conduct a range of audacious hold-ups and kidnappings which earned them the sobriquet ‘The Robin Hood Guerillas’. Their mode was ‘armed propaganda’ which combined the mostly harmless brandishing of weapons with a healthy (if somewhat tedious) dose of ideology and propaganda to which they subjected their victims. At first there was, indeed, a Robin Hood element, when they combined social justice and retribution against corruption in their criminal activities, often undertaken both as a form of armed propaganda and in order to procure more weapons, ammunition and money to conduct further raids.

Despite admiration of both the Cuban and Chinese revolutions, and the sympathy the leaders had for the agricultural workers (particularly by Raul Sendic and Jose Mujica) it was decided that they would eschew the examples of other peasant-based revolutions and instead undertaken urban guerilla action. This was largely a result of geography: as a small, flat country there were none of the mountain hideaways that guerillas could melt into, and at times when both Brazil and Argentina had right-wing governments, they could not count on fleeing over the border.

At first, they seemed to have widespread, if often tacit support. They could call on doctors to repair their injuries, and lawyers, bank officials, government employees and others enabled them to infiltrate and provide intelligence about their targets. Brum reveals a grudging admiration for the audacity of their raids, and their sheer ingenuity and logistical planning of escapes when the police rounded them up. Their escapes- especially when 100 prisoners tunnelled out of the Punta Carretas – made them seem invincible (in much the same way, unfortunately, as the drug cartels in South America have seemed inthe past).

Brum spends some time on Alejandro Otero, the police commissioner with formidable MLN-hunting skills, who in a Javier/Jean Valjean type of struggle with the Tupumaros, exhibited a mixture of fixation and grudging admiration, as did the Tupumaros with him.

But over time, as more of the original Tupamaros were arrested or fled into exile, the movement became more violent. They lost support when their kidnap hostages were murdered, rather than set free after a few months, and in many ways their actions prompted the takeover of the military, albeit with the acquiescence of the civil authorities. The murder of rural labourer, Pascasio Baez, by lethal injection of penothal also cost them support.

Once popular support leached away from them, and the grip of the military hardened, the Tupumaros disappeared from the headlines. But Brum follows them into their imprisonment, divided into groups of three, held in prisons with varying degrees of cruelty.

I gather that Brum makes some contested points in this book. He argues that it was not certain-indeed, he leans towards refuting- that U.S. government official Dan Mitrione, who was murdered in 1970, actually trained the police in torture methods. He suggests that during 1972 and 1985, when the nine most prominent Tupamaros were imprisoned, and moved from one military base to another, the Tupamaros themselves sent out feelers to the very military that was imprisoning them, to see if they could work together.

He finishes his book with a ‘where-are-they-now’ survey, current as of 2014. Raul Sendic, the icon of the Tupamaros, suffered appalling facial injuries in a shoot-out, and died in 1989. Some, like Jorge Zabalaz and Mauricio Rosencof retained their radicalism. Brum is bemused, and amused, by the popularity of Jose Mujica that saw him become no less than President. As he points out, a surprising number of the players in the 1970s still had sons involved in politics fifty years later.

Brum criticizes the barbarity on both sides- on the part of the Tupamaros who drifted away from the somewhat romantic (and romanticized) view of the Robin Hood guerilla, and on the part of the military who honed their cruelty on the nine Tupamaros leaders under their control. Despite the audacity and logistic brilliance of their early exploits, Brum’s linking of them with their ideological descendants like the Californian Symbionese Liberation Army who kidnapped Patty Hearst, or the Weather Underground, or the urban guerilla Rote Armee Fraktion in Germany, or the Italian Brigate Rosse is rather chilling. He closes his book with the observation that, despite Mujica’s proclamation that he “fought for a fatherland for all”

…many individuals were left behind in shootings, executions, and torture chambers: civilians, insurgents, policemen, and soldiers. For them there really was no more fatherland.

I enjoyed this book, although I was mystified by the curious insertions of #### and ++++++ to denote endnotes, as well as nearly 600 footnotes throughout the text. It was supportive of a reader with little knowledge, and he established the major characters sufficiently clearly that you could trace them throughout the narrative, although they threatened to be swamped by so many minor characters mentioned in person. Jose Mujica, whom I admire, once said

I am still a Tupumaro. I never stopped being one. A Tupumaro is someone who rebels against injustice.

After reading this book, I think I understand a little better what he meant.

My rating: 8/10

Sourced from: purchased Kindle book

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 1-8 August 2025

The Ezra Klein Show Best Of: Barbara Kingsolver on ‘Urban/Rural Antipathy’ This episode was recorded some time ago, when Barbara Kingsolver’s Demon Copperhead had just been released (see my review of the book here) I knew that Kingsolver was from Appalacia, but I hadn’t realized how much she saw this as an Appalacian story and her attempt to breach the chasm of understanding between urban and rural Americans. This was before the Second Coming of Trump, and in many ways she foreshadows it here. Good interview.

The Human Subject (BBC) The Mothers of Gynaecology This is the story of a 17 year old enslaved girl – Anarcha – and the other enslaved women who gave birth to the field of gynaecology. The year is 1845 and Anarcha has just had a baby. But there’s a problem. She was in great pain and her doctor, J Marion Sims, believed nothing can be done about it – at least at first.

She had developed a vesico-vaginal fistula, a hole between her bladder and her vagina. This left her incontinent and in the doctor’s words: “aside from death, this was about the worst accident that could have happened to the poor young girl”. [Many women in third world countries, particularly in Africa, continue to suffer this appalling, life-changing condition]

It was only once Dr Sims worked out a way of getting better access to the vaginal area through the Sims speculum and the ‘Sims Position’ (lying on the left side) that he realized that maybe something could be done. He ‘took over’ Anarcha, as well as a number of other enslaved girls with the same condition, and began experimenting without consent (she was enslaved, after all) and worse still anaesthetic! Anarcha endured 30 surgeries. Ironically, Dr Sims is the one who is celebrated as the ‘father of gynecology’ with his women ‘subjects’ largely unrecognized as the ‘mothers of gynecology’ until recently.

Missing in the Amazon (Guardian) In June 2002 a Guardian journalist, Dom Phillips and an indigenous expert on uncontacted and recently contacted indigenous Amazonian tribes, were murdered. It garnered a lot of attention, probably because Phillips was British, because indigenous rights activists and environmentalists have long been in danger on the Amazon. This is a six-part series published by the Guardian, and pleasingly, the episodes only go for about 1/2 an hour (just the right length!) Episode 1: the disappearance starts with the search for their boat and bodies on the Javari River in the Vale do Javari in western Brazil, right in the middle of South America, near the borders of Colombia, Peru and Bolivia. It’s supposedly an indigenous-only zone, but it is a notorious route for drug-trafficking, and illegal mining, fishing and logging. Episode 2: The Journalist and the President looks at Dom Phillips, who started off as a music journalist and ended up being a freelance journalist working all over the world. He had become particularly interested in Brazilian politics and economic and cultural development, and was married to a Brazilian woman and lived in Brazil. When Jair Bolsonaro came to power in 2019 he gave the green light to many illegal activities on indigenous land, and 2 billion trees were lopped during his presidency. Terrible man.

‘Bombard the Headquarters! The Cultural Revolution in China’ by Linda Jaivin

2025, 128 p.

Since the Orange One has launched his mayhem on the world – did this second presidency really only start in January?- China and Xi Jinping are presenting themselves as a calm, considered and stable presence on the world stage in comparison. It’s a seductive thought, but after reading this small book, I came away convinced that there is a fundamental difference between China and Western democracies in terms of both means and ends that we ignore at our peril.

Many historians mark 16 May 1966 as the start of the Cultural Revolution, when Jiang Quing (Mao’s fourth wife) and Mao circulated a document amongst the Party members which warned of ‘counter-revolutionary revisionists’ who had infiltrated the Party, the government, the army and cultural circles. This document was only made public a year later, but it was popularized in August 1966 by “Bombard the Headquarters”, a short text in written by Mao Zedong himself and published widely. It was a call to the students, who were already confronting their teachers and university lecturers, exhorting them that ‘to rebel is justified’. Yet the headquarters he was urging them to target were the headquarters of his government; of his party. Within three months there would be 15 to 20 million Red Guards, some already in university, others as young as ten. They were urged to ‘smash the Four Olds (old ideas, culture customs and habits) to make was for the creation of a new revolutionary culture. Mao did not explicitly call for the formation of the Red Guards, but he harnessed them as an alternative source of power to the government and, at first, beyond the control of the army until it also joined in the Cultural Revolution in January of 1967.

With Khruschev’s denunciation of the cult of Stalin, Mao felt that Russia had betrayed the revolution and that China needed to return to the dictatorship of the proletariat. Even though 1966 is seen by many as the starting point, Mao had been moving towards this point for several years, moving against the deputy mayor of Beijing and historian Wu Han, removing the People’s Liberation Army chief of staff and premier Luo Ruiquing, and splitting with the Japanese Communist Party because it failed to call out Soviet revisionism.

Some of his party colleagues, most especially Liu Shaoqui, Deng Xioping and Zhou Enlai, held qualms about Mao’s call for continuous revolution led by the Red Army. And well they might have, because quite a few of Mao’s judgment calls – The Great Leap Forward and the Hundred Flowers Campaign- brought unseen (to him) consequences, and the schemes ended up being abandoned. But despite any reservations his colleagues may have held, the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution went forward, with the Red Guards murdering 1800 people in Beijing alone in Red August 1966. The Red Guards were joined by the workers in late 1966, and the Army in January 1967.

At a dinner to celebrate Mao’s 73rd birthday on 26 December 1966, he proposed a toast to “all-out civil war and next year’s victory”. He got his civil war. Children denounced parents; both the Red and the conventional army split into factions. The targets of the Cultural Revolution were the Five Bad Categories- landlords, rich peasants, counter-revolutionaries, bad elements and ‘rightists’. Temples, churches and mosques were trashed; libraries set alight, hair salons and dressmakers’ shops attacked, and even the skeletons of a Wanli emperor and his two empresses were attacked and burned. The verb ‘to struggle’ came to have a new meaning as ‘enemies’ were “struggled” into the airplane position, forced to bend at the waist at 90 degrees with their arms straight behind, with heavy placards hung around their necks and hefty dunce caps on their heads. Teachers, academics, musicians, writers, local officials were all ‘struggled’, with day-long interrogations that ended with instructions to return the next day for more after being allowed to go home overnight. No wonder so many people committed suicide.

By September 1968, the civil war was declared over, with ‘the whole nation turning Red’. However, with the deteriorating economic situation, and with a perception that people living in the cities were not pulling their weight, Mao decided that ‘educated youth’ needed to receive re-education by the poor and middle-class peasantry (p. 68). In 1969 as many as 2.6 million ‘educated youth’ -including present-day president Xi Jinping- left the cities for the country side. Some did not have to go too far from home, but others were exiled to the brutal winters of the Great Northeast Wilderness, or the tropical jungles of Yunnan in the south-west. Some villagers were ambivalent about these ‘soft’ teenagers, although they welcomed the goods and knowledge that they brought with them. The young people were often shocked by the poverty and deprivation in the villages, which contrasted starkly with the propaganda of the happy prosperous countryside they had accepted.

The Cultural Revolution had morphed in its shape, with the 9th Party congress declaring that the Cultural Revolution was over in April1969, and Mao criticizing his wife Jiang Quing and her radical associates in the ‘Gang of Four’ in May 1975. The outside world was changing too. A border war with USSR in March 1969 provoked fears of nuclear war, and the United Nations recognized the People’s Republic of China over Taiwan. President Nixon visited China in February 1972 (Australia’s Gough Whitlam, then opposition leader, had visited in July 1971) and Mao died in September 1976, eight months after the death of Zhou Enlai. In 1981 the Party declared that the Cultural Revolution had been a mistake, and that Mao had been misled by ‘counter-revolutionary cliques’. All at the cost of at least 4.2 million people being detained and investigated, and 1.7 million killed. Some 71,200 families were destroyed entirely. It has been estimated that more people were killed in the Cultural Revolution than the total number of British, American and French soldiers and citizens killed in World War II (p. 106)

The Cultural Revolution may seem an event of the 20th century it’s not that far away. Xi Jinping and his family were caught up in the Cultural Revolution, and tales of him toiling alongside the peasants in the countryside is part of his own political mythology. We here in the West are well aware of the Tienanmen Square protests of 1989, but there is no discussion of them in China. When Xi Jinping took power in 2012, discussion of the Cultural Revolution, the Great Leap Forward and the resulting famine, were all increasingly censored. Xi Jinping abolished the two-term limit to presidential office in 2018, making it possible for him to be President for life. New generations of nationalist fanatics have arisen, likened (for good or bad) to the Red Guards.

This is only a short book, running to just 107 pages of text. In its formatting and intent, it is of a pair with Sheila Fitzpatrick’s The Death of Stalin (reviewed here), and both books deal with hinge-points that, although taking place some 50 years ago, resonate today with even more depth. As with Fitzpatrick’s book, Bombard the Headquarters opens with a timeline and a cast of characters, but I found the brevity of Jaivin’s character list made it harder to establish the various protagonists in my mind, exacerbated further by unfamiliar names. What I really did like was the way that she interwove the stories and experiences of individuals alongside the ‘massed’ nature of this revolution. When we see the huge crowds of people in Tiananmen Square, and the chilling precision of the Chinese army at the parades that dictators are so fond of, it is hard to find the individual, but she has worked hard to keep our attention on the people who lived through, suffered, and did not always survive such a huge experiment in social engineering.

My rating: 8/10

Sourced from: Review copy from Black Inc. books, with thanks.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 24-31 July 2025

Behind the Bastards Christmas Non-Bastard The Tupamaros of Uruguay Parts 1 and 2 This program delves into the ‘baddies’ but as part of their Christmas Good Cheer, they nominate a non-bastard, and in December 2021, that was Jose Mujica and the Tupamaros. It’s presented by journalist Robert Evans, who has mainly worked on Bellingcat and specializes in extremism. He has read up on other people’s research for this episode, and I did learn some things that I didn’t already know. For example, the fact that there are many old cars in Uruguay because people believe in looking after things and not throwing them out (which fits in well with Jose Mujica’s ‘sobriety’); or the fact that during the 1950s a plebiscite with a very low turnout voted to abolish the position of president, which further cemented the two-party system already in operation. Or the fact that during the 1960s the first highly-educated population of Uruguayan students came of age. Or that during the mid 60s to 1980s, about 300 Tupamaros’ were killed, and they killed about 50 people.

But it was REALLY annoying to hear the way he mangled Mujica’s name, and where on earth is Monty-video (pronounced as if it’s a local video shop in Montmorency) instead of Montevideo?? Ye Gods.

The Rest is History Episode 577 1066: The Norman Conquest (Part 4) So Harald Hardrada is dead; Harold Godwinson is dead, and William of Normandy is now the Conquerer. Why was it game over? Mostly because there was no-one competent left to lead the resistance who had the legitimacy to act as King. The teenaged Edgar Atheling was elected King of England by the Witan in 1066, but it never proceeded any further and he was never crowned. William had behind him a formidable war machine, and when he was crowned using traditional rites as the King of the Anglo Saxons at Westminster Abbey, there was both continuity and rupture. But within 20 years, the fashions had changed, all the dynasties were gone, and the Thanes were destroyed as a social order. Ten Norman families held 1/4 of England, and many families fled to Constantinople. Was this part of William’s plan? Probably not: instead his plan of castle and cathedral building was a response to constant uprisings throughout the country. By the time all the landowners came to pledge allegiance to him at Salisbury in 1086, the Domesday book had worked out who owned what under Edward I and who owned what now. William’s reign saw an end to the rivalry for the throne which had convulsed the country earlier.

Witness History BBC. This BBC program only goes for nine minutes, and they draw from interviews in the BBC archive. As a result, the majority of subjects deal with the 1930s onwards, but in The Russian Revolutionaries nearly stranded in London, it goes back to the 1907 congress of Russian revolutionaries held in London because it was too dangerous in Russia. The congress was attended by Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky but they ran out of money. Journalist Henry Brailsford arranged for them to meet a benefactor, who provided the funds for them to return home, and Brailsford himself was interviewed about it in 1947. This must be the ‘oldest’ witness history in the program because there wouldn’t be many witnesses to 1907!

‘The Casual Vacancy’ by J.R. Rowling

2012, 503 p.

As I have related several times in this blog over the years, when I was young I read Hans Christian Anderson’s The Snow Queen. In that story, a shard from an evil, broken mirror entered the eye of a little boy, Kay, who from then on could only see ugliness in everything. I think that J. R. Rowling may have a similar shard in her eye, at least in this book. It was her first book for adults, written after the Harry Potter series that had captured young readers and accompanied them into adulthood. It is ugly, snarky and ends in a tragic melodramatic conclusion. I was hooked, after a very slow start, but in the closing pages of the book, I just thought “this is ridiculous”.

I’ve always thought that Rowling is very good with her beginnings, particularly in her Cormonan Strike books- three pages and you’re in. She starts well here too, with a death in the first few pages, but instead of jump-starting the book, the impetus dissipates as various people in the fictional town of Pagford learn that their local councillor Barry Fairbrother has died. The ‘casual vacancy’ caused by his death prompts a local election to fill his seat, and Rowling introduces a wide range of people who are taking a particular interest in this election.

Pagford is an older town, established in the days when ‘parishes’ were the backbone of local government, but time has brought many changes. A council estate called rather ironically The Fields, with low-income and social housing, had been built nearby and had been attached to the Pagford Parish. At the time of Barry’s death, the council had been engaged in negotiations to sever The Fields, and have it come under the jurisdiction of the larger, more modern city of Yarvil. For many Pagford ratepayers, this would shift the problem of drug addiction and social dislocation onto another council but Barry Fairbrother, as a former Fields boy himself, was leading the push to have The Fields remain in Pagford. The now-vacant seat on the parish council was a means to influence the outcome.

There is a huge range of characters in this book, and it took quite a while for me to embed who-was-who into my mind. They’re a rather unsavoury lot: the morbidly obese Howard Mollison who is angling to get his son onto the council; Colin ‘Cubby’ Wall, the school principal, who is tortured by the fear that he may have molested students without retaining any memory of the fact; local doctor Parminder Jawanda who supports keeping The Fields in Pagford, although her opinion is possibly influenced by her infatuation with Barry Fairweather; and Terri Weedon, a drug addict and prostitute from The Fields, whose daughter Krystal takes responsibility for caring for her young brother Robbie- among many other characters. Their partners and children resent each of them, all for various reasons, and there is barely a happy person amongst them. It’s all rather sordid in a petty, pathetic way. It’s not surprising, then, when posts under the name ‘The Ghost of Barry Fairweather’ begin appearing on the parish’s online forum, spilling the dirt on one person after another.

The narrative swings from one family constellation to the next, and gradually tightens its focus on two tragic deaths that make the election seem tawdry and petty. By this time, the pace of the book had really picked up and the majority of the characters were firmly established. But I just found myself saying “This is stupid!” as the ending became increasingly fast-paced and melodramatic. The ending was just as bleak as the whole scenario had been, and I felt as if some of the grubbiness of the book had rubbed off on me.

I gather that much of the ire against this book comes from a disappointment that it had none of the magic of Harry Potter. There’s certainly no magic here. Because of its provincial town setting, some have likened it to Middlemarch which likewise has a large cast of characters, going about their small, ultimately insignificant lives. But this is much grittier and nastier than Middlemarch, with its complexity laced through with snarkiness.

My rating: 7/10

Sourced from: a gift.

I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 16-23 July 2025

7.a.m. (Guardian) The Road to Yoorook is the first of a two-part series that was released at the same time as the Yoorook final report was handed to the Victorian government. The Yoorook truth-telling commission is the first one held in Australia. Although the indigenous population in Victoria is not large now compared with other states, prior to colonization Victoria was one of the most heavily populated areas of Australia , largely because of climate, geography and the abundance of food. It was also the home of many of the Aboriginal organizations of the 1970s, including the Aboriginal Legal Service, the Aboriginal Health Service. The First Peoples Assembly called for a truth-telling commission that had all the power of a royal commission, but at first – pathetically- they had trouble finding premises in which to hold the commission, and it took a directions hearing to get government compliance in making a building available. Part 2: The Truth Has Been Told has the stories of First Nations elders whose loved ones were stolen, and the changing policy settings that had such effects on their lives. It goes through the commission process, with the Premier and the Police Commissioner being called before it. Given the political climate of the present day, it is unlikely that we will see anything like it again.

In The Shadows of Utopia Season 2 Episode 10 The Cambodian Civil War Begins Part 1 deals with 1967. The foreword to the episode starts with the man we now know as Duch, who was at the time was a quietly-spoken communist teacher- we will meet him later, I’m sure. By this time, there was a contradiction between Sihanouk’s external and internal politics. Internally, he was veering between the left and right. At the end of 1966 he went to Paris for ‘health reasons’, leaving his Prime Minister Lon Nol in charge. In January and February 1967 riots broke out in Battambang, where the government cracked down on the black market sale of rice to Vietnam. Battambang had been the site of anti-French protest in the past, and it was close to the Thai border. Two-thirds of the rice harvest was being passed to the black market, and Lon Nol forced the sale of the rice to the government, at a low price. By April 2 1967 the resulting Samlaut uprising had morphed into a peasant revolt, which was quickly and violently suppressed. There were only a few hundred fighters, and they had some village support but they faced the superior technology of the army and betrayal by village vigilantes. This was the start of a new era of violence in an independent Cambodia. Historians are divided over the actual influence of the Communist Party of Kampuchea on the Samlaut uprising, but certainly the CPK decided on a nation-wide uprising at the start of 1968, against the disapproval of the Vietnamese communist party.

But Sihanouk couldn’t pretend now that unrest was all external. Sihanouk had dealt with the North Vietnamese, with the support of Russia and China. Internally, he wanted to eradicate the CPK, but he went for the wrong Marxists, and ended up pursuing all of the old Paris-based leadership. This led to false rumours that three of these leaders -Khieu Samphan, Hou Yuon and Hu Nim – had been murdered, and when the three re-appeared later, they were called the Three Ghosts.

The Rest is History Episode 556: 1066 The Battle of Hastings One of the first books that my parents bought for me specifically, on request, was the poetry book 1066 and all that. I was in grade 5 in primary school, but thinking back, it seems odd that we would have learned about the Battle of Hastings. Who knows. The Battle of Hastings took place on 14th October 1066, just three weeks after Harold Godwinson had seen off Harald Hadrada. William of Normanby had horses, where the English had shields, although given that it was an all-day battle, probably the horses weren’t that important anyway. Many of the myths about the Battle of Hastings are questionable. Was Harold really shot through the eye? The Bayeux Tapestry shows two figures identified as Harold, and it was reworked in the 19th century anyway? There’s an alternative scenario, identified in the account written closest to events, that says that he was butchered by four men including William the Conquerer.