Updated edition 2016, 75 pages & notes
Is it only Labor supporters ‘of a certain age’ who remember where they were in 1975 when they heard that the Whitlam government had been dismissed? I was in my second year at La Trobe University, and being November 11, it was in the midst of exams. I remember sitting on the brick steps at the Agora, wondering if the student troops would rally and whether there would be a march on Parliament House. But there was nothing- at least not immediately. I think that people were just stunned.
And, after reading Jenny Hocking’s small book The Dismissal Dossier: Everything You Were Never Meant to Know About November 1975, I’d have to add that not only were people just stunned, they were lied to as well. It has taken over forty years for the truth to trickle out, through vendettas, scribbled notes in archives, interviews, and re-evaluations. The story isn’t over yet: Jenny Hocking, who wrote the celebrated two-part biography of Gough Whitlam, is still pursuing ‘The Palace Letters’ between the Queen and her secretaries and Australia’s then-Governor General Sir John Kerr, which have been designated ‘personal and private’ by Buckingham Palace, and thus out of the reach of Australians.
So- what weren’t we meant to know and now we do, largely through Hocking’s persistence? We now know that the Palace did know ahead of time that Kerr was planning to sack Whitlam. Through Reg ‘Toe-Cutter’ Withers’ spilling of the beans after himself being dismissed, we know that Fraser was aware of it too. We now know that Sir Anthony Mason had been involved even before Sir Garfield Barwick (the Chief Justice) was, and that Barwick and Kerr agreed to obscure his involvement at the time and afterwards. We also know that Kerr, fearful that Whitlam would sack him first, had shored up his position with the Queen’s secretary and Prince Charles in advance. We now know that Kerr was anxious that a Royal Commission not be held into the Loans Affair because it would have come out that he had signed off on the minutes of the Executive Council meeting that approved the plan.
There’s a lot, too, that we have either forgotten or not realized the significance of. The Senate had not refused Supply, but the Liberal/Country party refused to vote on it. Whitlam’s poll numbers were improving, while Fraser’s were plummeting over the stalemate in the Senate. Whitlam had already spoken with Kerr about holding the half-Senate election days earlier and had the agreed papers in his pocket, which would have brought the stalemate to a head. The House of Representatives still sat on the afternoon after the Dismissal, and passed a motion of no-confidence in Fraser as Prime Minister by a margin on 10 votes – the ultimate breakpoint in our parliamentary democracy, which should have seen Fraser stepping down immediately. There were in effect two dismissals on 11 November: first the dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, then later that afternoon, the dismissal of the House of Representatives, which Kerr prorogued to avoid having to do anything with that embarrassing vote of no confidence.
These things have been revealed over the last forty years, but because they have been drip-fed, you tend not to see the whole picture. After Reg Withers revealed that Fraser had been in on it before the Dismissal, Fraser admitted that he had lied. How did I not know that? I remember Sir Anthony Mason’s dismissive “I owe history nothing” but I’d forgotten his role. I remember news of a dinner with Prince Charles, but didn’t make the connection. That’s why this book is so important. It’s only short, but it draws the threads together. It re-kindles the rage.
I was fortunate to hear Jenny Hocking speak last week (and a recording of her presentation can be found here). She reminded us that Gough’s exhortation was to “Maintain your rage and your enthusiasm“. Reading this book reminds me why we should maintain the pressure for a republic, and why Hocking’s own persistence and assiduity has been so important. After the Federal Court dismissed her attempt to have the Palace Letters revealed, just this afternoon she was granted Leave to Appeal to the High Court of Australia. Those letters will and must be revealed one day: I just hope that she and I live long enough to see them.
My rating: 5/5 because it’s it’s such an important book. Read it.
Sourced from: SLV e-book. (Did you know that you can download e-books from the State Library if you have a card?)
I have included this on the 2019 Australian Women Writers Challenge.
Well, I don’t need to have my rage rekindled, because I have never lost it. That election in 1974 was the first I ever voted in, and and I was shattered by what happened and have never got over the way our democracy was manipulated by Fraser & Co (and no, I never forgave him either).
But I’ve reserved this book at the library, because the more of us who review it, the more people will realise that they are lied to all the time by our parliament.
Pingback: The Dismissal Dossier, by Jenny Hocking | ANZ LitLovers LitBlog
Pingback: History, Memoir and Biography Round Up: August 2019 | Australian Women Writers Challenge Blog
Pingback: 2019 Australian Women Writers Challenge Completed | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip
Pingback: I hear with my little ear: Podcasts 16-23 May 2020 | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip
Pingback: The Palace Letters: the next step in the saga | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip
Pingback: Six Degrees of Separation: from ‘Normal People’ to…. | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip
Pingback: ‘The Palace Letters’ by Jenny Hocking | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip