‘Dickens’ Women’ with Miriam Margolyes

Having recently read Colonial Voices, I was very much aware of what an anachronistic performance Miriam Margolyes’ ‘Dickens’ Women’ is.  Generations past may have been the audience for a series of readings and impersonations, but it seems a particularly quaint genre now: a “nice night’s entertainment” as Barry Humphries’ Sandy Stone might have said.

But to describe this performance as merely “readings and impersonations” is to undersell it, because it is more like a theatrical essay, with a clear argument that is supported by the anecdotes and examples that she weaves into the work.  She argues that Dickens wove his own biography into the female characters he created, colouring them with his own anger, sense of betrayal, and often misogyny.  She moves back and forwards from argument and explication, to readings and then to performance of both male and female characters, sometimes in soliloquy, sometimes in dialogue.

The performance opens with Sairey Gamp from Martin Chuzzlewit, and I must admit that it took me a couple of minutes to recognize and recollect her.  Would I know who she was playing each time? I wondered, aware that even though I have read quite a few Dickens, I haven’t read them all and I often forget which character appeared where.  But I need not have feared: she wove into the narrative a clear identification of who each character was, often with a bit of contextualizing information.  It didn’t matter that I hadn’t read Dombey and Son, or The Uncommercial Traveller or The Old Curiosity Shop.

Margolyes has been performing this show since 1989 and it is a very tight, confident performance.  In creating her 23 characters, she uses everything – her body, her beautiful clear voice, timing, lighting, gesture and stance- and at times, she almost seemed to change physically before your eyes.  I found myself scarcely daring to breathe watching her embody Miss Havisham, afraid that the spell would break.  It didn’t.

A very nice night’s entertainment indeed.

6 responses to “‘Dickens’ Women’ with Miriam Margolyes

  1. It’s a great show isn’t it. I saw it a few years ago, before I started blogging. Sue Chan had just come to Canberra, Louise came down from Orange, and they both came to the show with a few from my reading group. It was a good night.
    Like you I wondered if not having read all of Dickens would spoil it, but it didn’t. I agree that it is like an essay. I was tempted, really, to go again …

  2. Ah, I remember that night so very well. It was fantastic! I worried back then about my appalling knowledge of Dickens (I hadn’t read any at that stage, and now have only read A Christmas Carol, which I don’t think she uses, and the first half of Bleak House, twice)- it was still a magic, entralling, entertaining show. And this year she’s coming to Orange! YAY. I’ve organised a group of lovely ladies to go, and am looking forward to another fabulous performance. She’s just such a commanding personality, I love watching her in interviews too. Did she do a question and answer session after the show? I remember she did that in Canberra, that was wonderful too.

  3. I would not be worried about not having read every single Dickens novel. After all, who has?

    But I would be very leery of his skewed portrayals of women. Thankfully, you noted, Miriam Margolyes specifically argued that Dickens wove his own biography into the female characters he created, colouring them with his own anger, sense of betrayal and often misogyny. The disgusting behaviour he showed his wife should never be forgotten.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s