2002, 380 P plus notes
There are some biographies where you think that there’s no point in anyone else even picking up their pen to write another one. Claire Tomalin’s biography of Samuel Pepys falls into that category. This isn’t the first time I have read this book, because I read it in 2005- certainly long enough to have forgotten much of the details. That was before I had been to London myself, and before I had started my own academic work in biography. I very much enjoyed it in 2005 and enjoyed it even more fourteen years later.
I think that I first became aware of Samuel Pepys in a school reader, where his eyewitness report of the Great Fire of London was reproduced. I’d always associated him more with the events that he wrote about (the fire, the plague etc) rather than as a person in his own right. But as Claire Tomalin points out, perhaps his most striking and original achievement was to see himself, his actions and his motivations, as a topic in themselves. One of the most opaque things over time and culture is to sense how people saw themselves, especially when such a question was so often overlaid with religious language. In Pepys we have a man holding himself up to his own scrutiny, laughing at himself, and at times writing what he knew could be used against him politically.
Pepys’ diaries covered only nine of his seventy years. It’s not really clear why he started writing them, but it was a very deliberate act when he purchased a notebook and carefully ruled up each page – all 280 of them- and drew 20-30 evenly spaced lines on which to write. He wrote in shorthand, with some proper nouns written in English, and breaking into pidgin Spanish when he wanted to describe some of his (all too frequent) amatory adventures.
Although Pepys’ diaries of course provide the richest source for Tomalin’s work (and indeed, the work of any Pepys scholar), this biography devotes about 1/3 of its length to the 1660-1669 period of the diaries. The other 2/3 deals with his life before beginning the diaries, and then after the diaries. This seems a judicious weighting, and one which placed the journals, important though they are, into the context of his whole life.
The book starts with a lengthy list of ‘who’s who’ which I found myself turning to frequently. As Tomalin highlights, when Pepys was starting out on his career, contacts were everything in making it possible for this son of a tailor to end up as a high-level civil servant and Member of Parliament. Even though I’m not in the habit of taking my history from Academy Award winning films, the recent film The Favourite exemplified the trails of patronage that could bring distant cousins into orbits far beyond their expectations.
What struck me particularly on this second reading, and particularly in days when watching the so-far unsuccessful attempts at political change in Venezuela, is just how dangerous it is when a country undertakes a huge political change. I’m not talking about elections, which in our case are just variations on the same, but the big political about-faces. Pepys experienced a number of such changes, at an uncomfortably close quarter to royal power, but without the means or patronage to have any influence at all on events. He saw the execution of Charles I; he supported Oliver Cromwell when he was a young man; he managed to switch to Charles II in time; he escaped suspicion (just) after the Popish plots; and he acquiesced when William took the throne. The people he aligned himself with survived, and so he did too.
Although the book is largely chronologically arranged into 3 parts (Part I pre-diaries; Part II 1660-1669 diary entries; Part III 1670-1703), its chapters are thematic as well e.g. work, marriage, science. She does not cite at length from the journals themselves, choosing to comment on them instead of reproducing them.
At times Pepys seems like us: at other times, not. His infidelities and what now reads like rank sexual harassment are uncomfortable reading; his domestic violence to his wife and servants is not endearing. But I found myself laughing when his enraged wife threatened his manhood with red-hot fire tools when she found out about his affair with the maid, and his own awareness of his hypocrisy, failings and weakness keeps him human. Tomalin has given us a fully rounded man, and I just can’t imagine anyone else doing it better.
By the way, the first time I read this book, I was fascinated by the Pepys Diary page, which is still going. Each day an entry from the diaries is posted in full and people, who have a wealth of information about Pepys and London, annotate the entries. Another site which I’ve enjoyed, although it’s aimed at children is an interactive site fireoflondon.org.uk
My rating: 9.5/10 This is biography at its best
Sourced from: CAE bookgroups.
For a long time (sixty years!) my only knowledge of C17th England was two books I had as a kid – Strange Stuarts (one page biographies) and Children of the New Forest. Since I got interested in early Eng.Lit. I’ve been trying to catch up. From something else I read, I’m thinking Pepys’ Diaries weren’t published for another 150-200 years?
I can’t quite remember, but an edited version appeared perhaps 150 years later (not sure), but the unexpurgated version wasn’t published until the 20th century sometime (I no longer have the book to look it up, I’m sorry)
So, you read it for your reading group this time? What a great choice.
I haven’t read this, but Claire Tomalin’s Austen is regarded by many as one of the best… she clearly has the knack.
BTW I loved your comment that “Even though I’m not in the habit of taking my history from Academy Award winning films”. Haha. I reckon it’s ok to take overall historical truths from fictional works!
Yes, it was our reading group choice, although I’d read it years before with the History/Biography Yahoo group from decades ago! We read her Austen book, and also the Invisible Woman book about Nelly Ternan and Charles Dickens. I see that she has an autobiography out too, which I’d like to read. She’s 85!! I always think of her as a younger writer.
Haha Janine, she probably was a young biographer when we first came across her!